Difference between revisions of "'The logic of the classical language'"

 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{main menu}}
{{main menu}}
==Abstract==
[[File:Spasmo emimasticatorio assiografia.jpg|left|300x300px]]
Masticationpedia embarks on a comprehensive exploration into the transformative shift from traditional clinical communication to the incorporation of sophisticated computational logic within the medical field, particularly highlighting its implications in craniofacial biology. The narrative underscores the pivotal transition towards leveraging encrypted machine languages and state-of-the-art technologies, such as gene sequencing and advanced imaging techniques, to substantially enhance diagnostic accuracy and the effectiveness of treatments.


Central to the document is the profound impact of epigenetics and phenomics in the medical domain, offering a groundbreaking perspective on how these sciences contribute to a more nuanced understanding of craniofacial anomalies. By delving into the complex interplay between genetic factors, environmental influences, and technological advancements, the text reveals the potential for pioneering personalized medical approaches that cater specifically to the unique genetic and epigenetic makeup of individuals.
The discourse extends into the realm of classical logic, elucidating its application in medical diagnostics through the utilization of logical operators, quantifiers, and the foundational principle of excluded middle. This methodological approach facilitates the formulation of precise diagnostic conclusions and the development of targeted treatment plans, particularly for conditions that manifest in the intricately complex craniofacial region.
Furthermore, the document passionately advocates for an interdisciplinary approach in tackling medical challenges, emphasizing the indispensable value of integrating insights from various scientific disciplines. This collaborative stance is posited as essential for advancing the frontier of patient care, especially in addressing the multifaceted challenges presented by craniofacial disorders.
Reflecting on future directions, the narrative calls for the adoption of a more flexible and dynamic logical language in the medical field, one that is capable of adapting to the intricacies and nuances inherent in clinical practice. This envisaged future emphasizes the importance of remaining open and responsive to the evolving landscape of scientific research, ensuring that medical practices continue to advance in line with cutting-edge discoveries.
In conclusion, "The Logic of the Classical Language - Masticationpedia" presents a compelling vision of a future where the fusion of computational logic, advanced technology, and medical science heralds a new era of diagnostics and patient care. It champions a paradigm where medical language, enriched by the relentless progression of scientific knowledge, leads to unparalleled precision in diagnostics and a more effective, personalized approach to treatment, setting a new standard in patient care, particularly within the specialized field of craniofacial biology.
{{ArtBy|
{{ArtBy|
| autore = Gianni Frisardi
| autore = Gianni Frisardi
Line 7: Line 19:
}}
}}


<center><div class="colour-button">[[Special:UserLogin&returnto=Introduction+Page|Read more]]</div>
==Introduction==
</center>
In the previous chapter, dedicated to the "[[Logic of medical language|Logic of Medical Language]]", we aimed to shift the focus from symptoms or clinical signs to an encrypted machine language. In this context, the arguments of Donald E. Stanley, Daniel G. Campos, and Pat Croskerry are particularly pertinent, especially when connected to the concept of time '''<math>t_n</math>''' as an information vector (anticipating the symptom) and to the consideration of the message as a machine language rather than a verbal language).
 
<ref>{{Cite book  
== Abstract ==
| autore = Stanley DE
[[File:Spasmo emimasticatorio.jpg|left|300x300px]]'''Introduction'''
| autore2 = Campos DG
 
| titolo = The logic of medical diagnosis
In the previous chapter, dedicated to the "[[Logic of medical language|Logic of Medical Language]]", we shifted focus from traditional clinical signs to an encrypted machine language, highlighting the innovative contributions of Donald E. Stanley, Daniel G. Campos, and Pat Croskerry. They emphasized the use of time as an information vector in diagnostics<ref>{{Cite book | autore = Stanley DE | autore2 = Campos DG | titolo = The logic of medical diagnosis | url = https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23974509/ | opera = Perspect Biol Med | anno = 2013 | DOI = 10.1353/pbm.2013.0019 | PMID = 23974509}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book | autore = Croskerry P | titolo = Adaptive expertise in medical decision making | url = https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898 | opera = Med Teach | anno = 2018 | DOI = 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898 | PMID = 30033794}}</ref>.
| url = https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23974509/
 
| volume =
This paradigm shift does not diminish the value of clinical history but enhances it by integrating a computational approach to validate medical diagnostics. "Craniofacial Biology" is explored comprehensively, with pivotal studies by Townsend and Brook challenging existing paradigms and proposing new clinical applications through interdisciplinary approaches.<ref>{{Cite book | autore = Townsend GC | autore2 = Brook AH | titolo = The face, the future, and dental practice | url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12157 | opera = Aust Dent J | anno = 2014 | DOI = 10.1111/adj.12157 | PMID = 24646132}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book | autore = Sperber GH | autore2 = Sperber SM | titolo = The genesis of craniofacial biology | url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12131 | opera = Aust Dent J | anno = 2014 | DOI = 10.1111/adj.12131 | PMID = 24495071}}</ref>Additionally, the role of epigenetics and phenomics in this field is underlined, offering new insights into dental and craniofacial anomalies through the genetic, epigenetic, and environmental interplay.<ref>{{Cite book | autore = Williams SD | autore2 = Hughes TE | autore3 = Adler CJ | autore4 = Brook AH | autore5 = Townsend GC | titolo = Epigenetics: a new frontier in dentistry | url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12155 | opera = Aust Dent J | anno = 2014 | DOI = 10.1111/adj.12155 | PMID = 24611746}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book | autore = Yong R | autore2 = Ranjitkar S | autore3 = Townsend GC | autore4 = Brook AH | autore5 = Smith RN | autore6 = Evans AR | autore7 = Hughes TE | autore8 = Lekkas D | titolo = Dental phenomics | url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12156 | opera = Aust Dent J | anno = 2014 | DOI = 10.1111/adj.12156 | PMID = 24611797}}</ref>This extensive review also incorporates diverse studies, illustrating the dynamic complexities of craniofacial development and the significant implications for future dental practices<ref>{{Cite book | autore = Peterkova R | autore2 = Hovorakova M | autore3 = Peterka M | autore4 = Lesot H | titolo = Three‐dimensional analysis of the early development of the dentition | url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12130 | opera = Aust Dent J | anno = 2014 | DOI = 10.1111/adj.12130}}</ref>. In summary, this chapter emphasizes not only the advanced computational methodologies enhancing diagnostic precision but also the critical interdisciplinary perspectives necessary for holistic patient care in craniofacial anomalies.
| opera = Perspect Biol Med
 
| anno = 2013
 
| editore =
'''Mathematical Formalism:''' In this chapter, we revisit the clinical case of Mary Poppins, who has been suffering from Orofacial Pain for over ten years due to "Temporomandibular Disorder" (TMD). This section delves into the complexity of using Classic Language Logic to achieve a precise diagnostic definition.
| città =
 
| ISBN =
'''Propositions''' The simplest propositions in logic can be combined using logical operators and quantifiers to construct complex logical statements, enhancing the precision and rigor required in mathematical and scientific reasoning. Key logical operators include:
| PMID = 23974509
* '''Conjunction''' (<math>\land</math>),
| PMCID =
* '''Disjunction''' (<math>\lor</math>),
| DOI = 10.1353/pbm.2013.0019
* '''Negation''' (<math>\urcorner</math>),
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
* '''Implication''' (⇒),
| LCCN =
* '''Logical consequence''' (<math>\vdash</math>),
| OCLC =  
* '''Universal quantifier''' (<math>\forall</math>),
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book  
* '''Existential quantifier''' (<math>\exists</math>).
| autore = Croskerry P
 
| titolo = Adaptive expertise in medical decision making
These tools help form the backbone of logical reasoning used to navigate complex diagnostic processes in medical practice.
| url = https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898?journalCode=imte20
 
| volume =
'''Proof by Contradiction:''' This method involves demonstrating that the negation of a proposition leads to a contradiction, thereby proving the original proposition under the principle of the "law of excluded middle". This fundamental aspect of classical logic asserts that a proposition must be true if its negation is false<ref>{{Cite book | author = Pereira LM | author2 = Pinto AM | title = Reductio ad Absurdum Argumentation in Normal Logic Programs | url = http://www-lia.deis.unibo.it/confs/ArgNMR/proceedings/ArgNMR-proceedings.pdf#page=100 | year = 2007 | publisher = Arg NMR | city = Tempe, Arizona - Caparica, Portugal}}</ref>.
| opera = Med Teach
 
| anno = 2018
 
| editore =  
'''Predicates:'' Predicates are expressions that assert something about a set of elements, such as "all volleyball players are tall" ((<math>X</math being volleyball players). They are used extensively to describe groups of patients or medical conditions, providing a structured way to apply logical reasoning in medical diagnoses.
| città =  
 
| ISBN =  
Further diagnostic support is provided through the analysis of axiographic traces and surface electromyography, confirming the presence of TMD based on the observed asymmetry and functional abnormalities in masticatory muscles<ref>{{cite book | autore = Castroflorio T | autore2 = Talpone F | autore3 = Deregibus A | autore4 = Piancino MG | autore5 = Bracco P | titolo = Effects of a Functional Appliance on Masticatory Muscles of Young Adults Suffering From Muscle-Related Temporomandibular Disorder | url = https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15189308/ | opera = J Oral Rehabil | anno = 2004 | DOI = 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01274.x | PMID = 15189308}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | autore = Maeda N | autore2 = Kodama N | autore3 = Manda Y | autore4 = Kawakami S | autore5 = Oki K | autore6 = Minagi S | titolo = Characteristics of Grouped Discharge Waveforms Observed in Long-term Masseter Muscle Electromyographic Recording: A Preliminary Study | url = http://ousar.lib.okayama-u.ac.jp/files/public/5/56938/20190821181112825794/73_4_357.pdf | opera = Acta Med Okayama | anno = 2019 | DOI = 10.18926/AMO/56938 | PMID = 31439959}}</ref>.
| PMID = 30033794
 
| PMCID =  
 
| DOI = 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898
'''2nd Clinical Approach'''
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
 
| LCCN =  
This section presents further clinical evaluations including CT scans and electromyographic analysis which provide deeper insights into the structural and functional status of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). These findings are critical in confirming the diagnosis of TMD and understanding its impact on orofacial pain.
| OCLC =  
 
}}</ref>  
'''Propositions in the Dental Context'''


In an attempt to apply mathematical formalism to interpret the dentist's diagnostic conclusions using classical logic language, we define the following predicates:
However, this does not lessen the importance of the clinical history, established on a pseudo-formal verbal language, which has now firmly entrenched itself in clinical practice and has proven its diagnostic effectiveness. Our aim in emphasizing a machine language and the system is merely to provide an additional opportunity to validate Medical-Diagnostic Science. We are fully aware that our "Linux Sapiens" remains puzzled by what has been anticipated and continues to ponder.
*<math>x \equiv</math> Normal patients (where "normal" refers to patients commonly encountered in a specialist setting)
*<math>A(x) \equiv</math> Presence of bone remodeling with detected osteophyte from stratigraphic exams and condylar CT
*<math>B(x)\equiv</math> Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) resulting in orofacial pain (OP)
*<math>\mathrm{a}\equiv</math> Specific patient: Mary Poppins


We establish that for every normal patient <math>\mathrm{\mathcal{A}}(\text{x})</math>, if they test positive for the TMJ radiographic examination <math>\mathrm{\mathcal{A}}(\text{x})</math> [see Figures 2 and 3], then they are affected by TMD <math>\rightarrow\mathrm{\mathcal{B}}(\text{x})</math>. Consequently <math>\vdash</math> if Mary Poppins tests positive (and is considered a "normal patient") for the TMJ radiographic exam <math>A(a)</math>, it follows that she too is affected by TMD <math>\rightarrow \mathcal{B}(a)</math>. This can be formally expressed as:
{{q2|Could the logic of classical language help us solve the dilemma of poor Mary Poppins?|A bit of patience, please}}


{|
We cannot limit ourselves to providing a conventional answer, as science progresses not through baseless assertions but through questions and reflections that have passed the scrutiny of scientific validation. This compels us to explore and give voice to thoughts, perplexities, and doubts raised by certain key concepts discussed in various scientific articles.
| <math>{a \in x \mid \forall \text{x} ; A(\text{x}) \rightarrow {B}(\text{x}) \vdash A( a)\rightarrow B(a) }</math>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|<math>(1)</math>
|-


|}
Among these critical topics is "Craniofacial Biology".


To verify the truthfulness of this proposition, we resort to proof by contradiction. If the negation of the proposition generates a contradiction, we can conclude that the original hypothesis of the dentist is correct:
We begin with an influential study by Townsend and Brook,
<ref name=":0">{{Cite book
| autore = Townsend GC
| autore2 = Brook AH
| titolo = The face, the future, and dental practice: how research in craniofacial biology will influence patient care
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12157
| volume =
| opera =  Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore = Australian Dental Association
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID = 24646132
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12157
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref> in which the authors challenge the current research paradigm, both theoretical and applied, in "Craniofacial Biology", aiming to derive clinical considerations and implications. One aspect they address is the "Interdisciplinary Approach", through which Geoffrey Sperber and his son Steven recognized the potential for exponential growth in the field of "Craniofacial Biology" due to technological innovations such as gene sequencing, CT scans, MRI imaging, laser scanning, image analysis, ultrasound, and spectroscopy.
<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Sperber GH
| autore2 = Sperber SM
| titolo = The genesis of craniofacial biology as a health science discipline
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12131
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore = Australian Dental Association
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID = 24495071
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12131
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>


{|
Another topic of significant interest within 'Craniofacial Biology' is the recognition that biological systems are considered 'Complex Systems'.
|<math>\urcorner{a \in x \mid \forall \text{x} ; A(\text{x}) \rightarrow {B}(\text{x}) \vdash A( a)\rightarrow B(a) }</math>
<ref>{{Cite book
|
| autore = Brook AH
|
| autore2 = Brook O'Donnell M
|
| autore3 = Hone A
|
| autore4 = Hart E
|
| autore5 = Hughes TE
|
| autore6 = Smith RN
|
| autore7 = Townsend GC
|
| titolo = General and craniofacial development are complex adaptive processes influenced by diversity
|<math>(2)</math>
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12158
|-
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore = Australian Dental Association
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID = 24617813
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12158
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref> 'Epigenetics' also plays a fundamental role in craniofacial molecular biology. Researchers from Adelaide and Sydney have provided an in-depth critique in the field of epigenetics, with a particular focus on dental and craniofacial disciplines.
<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Williams SD
| autore2 = Hughes TE
| autore3 = Adler CJ
| autore4 = Brook AH
| autore5 = Townsend GC
| titolo = Epigenetics: a new frontier in dentistry
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12155
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore = Australian Dental Association
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID = 24611746
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12155
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref> Phenomics, in particular, explored by these authors (see [[wikipedia:Phenomics|Phenomics]]), is a research area dedicated to measuring changes in teeth and associated orofacial structures resulting from interactions between genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors during development.
<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Yong R
| autore2 = Ranjitkar S
| autore3 = Townsend GC
| autore4 = Brook AH
| autore5 = Smith RN
| autore6 = Evans AR
| autore7 = Hughes TE
| autore8 = Lekkas D
| titolo = Dental phenomics: advancing genotype to phenotype correlations in craniofacial research
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12156
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore = Australian Dental Association
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID = 24611797
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12156
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>
In this context, it is crucial to mention the work of Irma Thesleff from Helsinki, Finland, who highlighted the existence of numerous transient signaling centers in the dental epithelium that play key roles in the tooth development program.
<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Thesleff I
| titolo = Current understanding of the process of tooth formation: transfer from the laboratory to the clinic
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12102
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2013
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID =
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12102
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>


|}
Additionally, the works by Peterkova R., Hovorakova M., Peterka M., and Lesot H., offer a fascinating overview of the processes involved in dental development.
'''Propositions in the Neurological Context'''
<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Peterkova R
| autore2 = Hovorakova M
| autore3 = Peterka M
| autore4 = Lesot H
| titolo = Three‐dimensional analysis of the early development of the dentition
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12130
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore = Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Dental Association
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID =
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12130
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Lesot H
| autore2 = Hovorakova M
| autore3 = Peterka M
| autore4 = Peterkova R
| titolo = Three‐dimensional analysis of molar development in the mouse from the cap to bell stage
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12132
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID =
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12132
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Hughes TE
| autore2 = Townsend GC
| autore3 = Pinkerton SK
| autore4 = Bockmann MR
| autore5 = Seow WK
| autore6 = Brook AH
| autore7 = Richards LC
| autore8 = Mihailidis S
| autore9 = Ranjitkar S
| autore10 = Lekkas D
| titolo = The teeth and faces of twins: providing insights into dentofacial development and oral health for practising oral health professionals
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12101
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2013
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID =
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12101
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>  For completeness, the studies by Han J., Menicanin D., Gronthos S., and Bartold P.M., which have explored a wide range of research on stem cells, tissue engineering, and periodontal regeneration, cannot be omitted.
<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Han J
| autore2 = Menicanin D
| autore3 = Gronthos S
| autore4 = Bartold PM
| titolo = Stem cells, tissue engineering and periodontal regeneration
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12100
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2013
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID =
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12100
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>


Suppose the neurologist contests conclusion (1), arguing that Mary Poppins does not suffer from TMD or that, at least, TMD is not the primary cause of her Orofacial Pain. Instead, he hypothesizes that Mary suffers from neuromotor type Orofacial Pain (<sub>n</sub>OP), classifying her not as a 'normal patient' but as a 'specific patient' (atypical for the dental specialist).
This review necessarily included discussions on genetic, epigenetic, and environmental influences that, during morphogenesis, lead to variations in the number, size, and shape of teeth,
<ref>{{Cite book
<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>|</nowiki> autore = Brook AH
<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>|</nowiki> autore2 = Jernvall J
<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>|</nowiki> autore3 = Smith RN
<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>|</nowiki> autore4 = Hughes TE
<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>|</nowiki> autore5 = Townsend GC
<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>|</nowiki> titolo = The Dentition: The Outcomes of Morphogenesis Leading to Variations of Tooth Number, Size and Shape
<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>|</nowiki> url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12160
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID =
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12160
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC = </ref><ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Seow WK
| titolo = Developmental defects of enamel and dentine: challenges for basic science research and clinical management
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12104
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID = 24164394
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12104
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>  as well as on the effect of tongue pressure on growth and craniofacial functions.
<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Kieser JA
| autore2 = Farland MG
| autore3 = Jack H
| autore4 = Farella M
| autore5 = Wang Y
| autore6 = Rohrle O
| titolo = The role of oral soft tissues in swallowing function: what can tongue pressure tell us?
| url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12103
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2013
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID =
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12103
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite book
| autore = Slavkin HC
| titolo = Research on Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology: Implications for the Future of Academic Dentistry
| url = https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6573384/
| volume =
| opera = J Dent Educ
| anno = 1983
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID = 6573384
| PMCID =
| DOI =
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>
Furthermore, special mention is deserved for the exceptional work of Townsend and Brook, whose content aligns well with the reflections of another prominent author, HC Slavkin. Slavkin
<ref>{{Cite book
| autore = Slavkin HC
| titolo = The Future of Research in Craniofacial Biology and What This Will Mean for Oral Health Professional Education and Clinical Practice
| url = https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24433547/
| volume =
| opera = Aust Dent J
| anno = 2014
| editore =
| città =
| ISBN =
| PMID = 24433547
| PMCID =
| DOI = 10.1111/adj.12105
| oaf = <!-- qualsiasi valore -->
| LCCN =
| OCLC =
}}</ref>asserts:


The neurologist's position can be formalized as follows:
The future holds countless opportunities to significantly improve the clinical outcomes of both congenital and acquired craniofacial malformations. Clinicians play a crucial role, as critical thinking combined with clinical experience greatly enhances diagnostic accuracy, and consequently, health outcomes.{{q2|I understand the progress of Science described by the authors but I do not understand the change in thought|Let me give you a practical example}}
{|
|<math>{a \not\in x \mid \forall \text{x} ; A(\text{x}) \rightarrow {B}(\text{x}) \and A( a)\rightarrow \urcorner B(a) }</math>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|<math>(3)</math>
|-


|}
In the "[[Introduction]]", we raised some issues related to malocclusion. In this context, we examine the logic of the medical language used by the dentist when faced with the clinical case described in the "Introductory Chapter", including diagnostic and therapeutic conclusions.


To validate this hypothesis through proof by contradiction, consider its negation:
The patient has a unilateral posterior crossbite and an anterior open bite.
{|
<ref>
|<math>\urcorner{a \not\in x \mid \forall \text{x} ; A(\text{x}) \rightarrow {B}(\text{x}) \and A( a)\rightarrow \urcorner B(a) }</math>
{{cita libro
|
|autore=Littlewood SJ
|
|autore2=Kandasamy S
|
|autore3=Huang G
|
|titolo=Retention and relapse in clinical practice
|
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28297088
|
|volume=
|
|opera=Aust Dent J
|}
|anno=2017
|editore=
|città=
|ISBN=
|LCCN=
|DOI=10.1111/adj.12475
|OCLC=
}}</ref>The crossbite represents a deviation from normal occlusion
<ref>{{cita libro
|autore=Miamoto CB
|autore2=Silva Marques L
|autore3=Abreu LG
|autore4=Paiva SM
|titolo=Impact of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite on children’s quality of life
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5962250/pdf/2176-9451-dpjo-23-01-00071.pdf
|volume=
|opera=Dental Press J Orthod
|anno=2018
|editore=
|città=
|ISBN=
|LCCN=
|DOI=
|OCLC=
}}</ref> and is therefore treated concurrently with the open bite.
<ref>{{cita libro
|autore=Alachioti XS
|autore2=Dimopoulou E
|autore3=Vlasakidou A
|autore4=Athanasiou AE
|titolo=Amelogenesis imperfecta and anterior open bite: Etiological, classification, clinical and management interrelationships
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24987656/
|volume=
|opera=J Orthod Sci
|anno=2014
|editore=
|città=
|ISBN=
|LCCN=
|DOI=10.4103/2278-0203.127547
|OCLC=
}}</ref><ref>{{cita libro
|autore=Mizrahi E
|titolo=A review of anterior open bite
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/284793
|volume=
|opera=Br J Orthod
|anno=1978
|editore=
|città=
|ISBN=
|LCCN=
|PMID  = 284793
|DOI=10.1179/bjo.5.1.21
|OCLC=
}}</ref>  This reasoning suggests that the model (masticatory system) is 'normalized to occlusion'; inversely interpreted, it implies that an occlusal discrepancy is a cause of malocclusion, that is, a disorder of the Masticatory System. Hence, an intervention to restore proper masticatory function is justified. (Figure 1a).
----
This example is the classical logic language, as we will explain in detail, but now a doubt arises:


===Compatibility and Incompatibility of Statements===
<blockquote>
The complexity arises when the dentist presents a series of statements based on clinical reports, such as stratigraphy and computed tomography (CT) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), indicating an anatomical flattening of the joint, axiography of the condylar paths with a reduction of cinematic convexity, and an electromyographic (EMG) interference pattern showing asymmetry on the masseters. These evidences can be considered co-causes of damage to the temporomandibular joint and, consequently, responsible for "Orofacial Pain".
At the time of formulating the orthodontic and orthognathic axioms, which led to the creation of protocols ratified by the International Scientific Community, were the information discussed in the introduction to this chapter already known?
</blockquote>
Certainly not, as the time '''<math>t_n</math>''' is a '''vector of information'''. However, despite this cognitive limitation, we proceed by adopting a classic language logic that raises relevant issues for citizen safety.
{{q2|this statement seems a bit risky to me!|sure, but the logical sequence has already been anticipated}}


Documents, reports, and clinical evidence can be used to make the neurologist's statement incompatible and support the dentist's diagnostic conclusion. To do this, we present some logical rules that describe compatibility or incompatibility according to classical language logic:
If this case were analyzed through a mentality oriented towards a 'system language logic', which we will discuss in a dedicated chapter, the conclusions could be surprising.
#A set of sentences <math>\Im</math> and a number <math>n\geq1</math> of other sentences or statements <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> are logically compatible if, and only if, their union <math>\Im\cup{\delta_1,\delta_2.....\delta_n}</math> is coherent.
# A set of sentences <math>\Im</math> and a number <math>n\geq1</math> of other sentences or statements <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> are logically incompatible if, and only if, their union <math>\Im\cup{\delta_1,\delta_2.....\delta_n}</math> is incoherent.


Let's examine this concept with practical examples. The dentist presents the following statement:
Analyzing the electrophysiological responses obtained from the patient with malocclusion, represented in figures 1b, 1c, and 1d (with explanations provided directly in the captions to facilitate the debate), it clearly emerges that these data lead us to considerations quite different from the simple 'Malocclusion'. Therefore, the orthodontic and orthognathic axioms based on a 'cause/effect' relationship show a significant conceptual gap.


<math>\Im</math>: Following the personalized techniques suggested by Xin Liang et al. that focuses on the quantitative microstructural analysis of the bone value fraction, trabecular number, trabecular thickness, and trabecular separation on each slice of a TMJ CT, it appears that Mary Poppins is affected by Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) and the consequence causes orofacial pain.
<gallery widths="350" heights="282" perrow="2" mode="slideshow">
File:Occlusal Centric view in open and cross bite patient.jpg|Figure 1a: Patient with malocclusion, open bite, and right posterior crossbite which in rehabilitative terms must be treated with orthodontic therapy and/or orthognathic surgery
File:Bilateral Electric Transcranial Stimulation.jpg|Figure 1b: Motor evoked potential from transcranial electrical stimulation of the trigeminal roots. Note the structural symmetry calculated from the peak-to-peak amplitude on the left and right masseters (upper and lower traces respectively)
File:Jaw Jerk .jpg|Figure 1c: Mandibular evoked reflex or mandibular jerk through percussion of the chin with a triggered neurological hammer. Note the functional symmetry calculated from the peak-to-peak amplitude on the left and right masseters (upper and lower traces respectively)
File:Mechanic Silent Period.jpg|Figure 1d: Mechanically evoked silent period from percussion of the chin with a triggered neurological hammer. Note the functional symmetry calculated on the integral area of the right and left masseters (upper and lower traces respectively).
</gallery>
----
{{q2|So, how does the classic language logic connect to this context? |The contrast with the "system language logic" highlights the interpretive limits of traditional approaches to malocclusion. This suggests that orthodontic models of cause/effect might need a critical review in light of new electrophysiological evidence.}}
==Mathematical Formalism==
In this chapter, we will revisit the clinical case of Mary Poppins, who has been suffering from Orofacial Pain for over ten years, with a diagnosis of "Temporomandibular Disorder" (TMD) confirmed by her dentist, or, more specifically, Orofacial Pain associated with TMD. To understand the complexity in arriving at a precise diagnostic definition using Classic Language Logic, it is fundamental to introduce and analyze the concept at the basis of the philosophy of classical language.


However, to further confirm the diagnosis, the dentist presents a series of additional assertions that should pass the compatibility filter described above, thus establishing a coherent basis for the diagnosis of TMD in Mary Poppins.
===Propositions===


<math>\delta_1=</math> Bone remodeling: The flattening of the axiographic traces shown in Figure 5 indicates the joint remodeling of Mary Poppins' right TMJ. This report can be related to a series of research and articles confirming how malocclusion can be associated with morphological changes of the temporomandibular joints, particularly if related to age. Indeed, the presence of chronic malocclusion can aggravate the scenario of bone remodeling.
"The simplest propositions can be combined with each other to form new and more complex propositions through the use of logical operators and quantifier connectors. These tools of logic allow us to construct broader statements starting from basic concepts, thus facilitating the formulation of theorems and proofs in mathematics and other disciplines that require precision and rigor.


<math>\delta_2=</math> Sensitivity and Specificity of the Axiographic Measurement: A study was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the data obtained from a sample of patients with temporomandibular joint disorders, using the ARCUSdigma axiographic system. The results showed a sensitivity of 84.21% for the right TMJ and 92.86% for the left TMJ, with a specificity of 93.75% and 95.65%, respectively.
The fundamental logical operators include:


<math>\delta_3=</math> Alteration in Condylar Paths: Urbano Santana-Mora and colleagues conducted a study on 24 adult patients suffering from severe chronic unilateral pain, diagnosed with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD). The research focused on the analysis of various functional and dynamic factors, including masticatory function, the remodeling of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) or condylar paths (CP), and lateral jaw movement or lateral guidance (LG). The CPs were evaluated using conventional axiography, while the LG was examined through kinesiographic tracing analysis. It was found that seventeen patients, corresponding to 71% of the total sample, habitually preferred to chew on one side. The mean and standard deviation of the CP angles were 47.90 (± 9.24) degrees, while the mean of the LG angles was 42.95 (± 11.78) degrees.
* '''Conjunction''', denoted by the symbol <math>\land</math> (and): represents the logical operation "AND". A compound proposition formed by two propositions joined with "and" is true only if both propositions are true.
* '''Disjunction''', denoted by the symbol <math>\lor</math> (or): represents the logical operation "OR". A compound proposition is true if at least one of the component propositions is true.
* '''Negation''', denoted by the symbol <math>\urcorner</math> (not): reverses the truth value of a proposition. If a proposition is true, its negation is false, and vice versa.
* '''Implication''', denoted by the symbol ⇒ (if... then): expresses a conditional relationship between two propositions. If the antecedent (first proposition) is true, then the consequent (second proposition) must be true for the implication to be true.
* '''Logical consequence''', denoted by the symbol <math>\vdash</math> (it follows that): indicates that a proposition is a logical consequence of the previous ones within a given logical system.
* '''Universal quantifier''', denoted by the symbol <math>\forall</math> (for all): expresses that the following proposition is true for all elements of a certain set.
* '''Proof''', often indicated by reasonings that lead to the conclusion symbolized with <math>\mid</math> (thus): indicates the culmination of an argument or logical reasoning that leads to a conclusion.
* '''Membership''', denoted by the symbol <math>\in</math> (belongs to) or <math>\not\in</math> (does not belong to): used to indicate whether an element belongs or does not belong to a set.


<math>\delta_4=</math> EMG Interference Pattern: M.O. Mazzetto and collaborators demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between the electromyographic activity of the anterior temporal muscles and the masseter and the 'Cranio-Mandibular Index' (CMI), with a value of <math>P=0,01</math>. This suggests that the use of CMI to quantify the severity of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) and electromyography (EMG) to assess the function of the masticatory muscles can represent a significant diagnostic and therapeutic element.
Quantifier connectors, such as the universal quantifier (<math>\forall</math>) and the existential quantifier (<math>\exists</math>), allow for extending statements to sets of elements, offering a way to express propositions concerning 'all elements' of a certain set or 'at least one element' of such a set.


Given the evidence presented and the statements made, the dentist can legitimately claim that the set of sentences <math>\Im</math>, and a number <math>n\geq1</math> of other positive clinical assertions or data <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> are logically compatible. This is because their union, <math>\Im\cup{\delta_1,\delta_2.....\delta_n}</math>, turns out to be coherent.
By combining these tools, it is possible to construct complex propositions that serve as the foundation for logical arguments and mathematical reasoning, eliminating the ambiguities typical of common language and providing a clear structure for analysis and proof".......................<center><div class="colour-button">[[Special:UserLogin&returnto=Introduction+Page|Read the full chapter]]</div>
<center><div class="colour-button">[[Special:UserLogin&returnto=Introduction+Page|Read more]]</div>
</center><blockquote>
</center>
== [[Strategic dental topics for authors to subscribe an article]] ==
{{bib}}
Classical Logic, Craniofacial Biology, Advanced Technologies, Medical Diagnostics, Epigenetics, Phenomics, Treatment Personalization, Craniofacial Anomalies, Formal Logic, Interdisciplinary Approach, Medical Innovations, Personalized Treatments, Computational Logic, Precision Diagnostics.</blockquote>
{{Bib}}

Latest revision as of 17:34, 3 May 2024

'The logic of the classical language'

Abstract

Spasmo emimasticatorio assiografia.jpg

Masticationpedia embarks on a comprehensive exploration into the transformative shift from traditional clinical communication to the incorporation of sophisticated computational logic within the medical field, particularly highlighting its implications in craniofacial biology. The narrative underscores the pivotal transition towards leveraging encrypted machine languages and state-of-the-art technologies, such as gene sequencing and advanced imaging techniques, to substantially enhance diagnostic accuracy and the effectiveness of treatments.

Central to the document is the profound impact of epigenetics and phenomics in the medical domain, offering a groundbreaking perspective on how these sciences contribute to a more nuanced understanding of craniofacial anomalies. By delving into the complex interplay between genetic factors, environmental influences, and technological advancements, the text reveals the potential for pioneering personalized medical approaches that cater specifically to the unique genetic and epigenetic makeup of individuals.

The discourse extends into the realm of classical logic, elucidating its application in medical diagnostics through the utilization of logical operators, quantifiers, and the foundational principle of excluded middle. This methodological approach facilitates the formulation of precise diagnostic conclusions and the development of targeted treatment plans, particularly for conditions that manifest in the intricately complex craniofacial region.

Furthermore, the document passionately advocates for an interdisciplinary approach in tackling medical challenges, emphasizing the indispensable value of integrating insights from various scientific disciplines. This collaborative stance is posited as essential for advancing the frontier of patient care, especially in addressing the multifaceted challenges presented by craniofacial disorders.

Reflecting on future directions, the narrative calls for the adoption of a more flexible and dynamic logical language in the medical field, one that is capable of adapting to the intricacies and nuances inherent in clinical practice. This envisaged future emphasizes the importance of remaining open and responsive to the evolving landscape of scientific research, ensuring that medical practices continue to advance in line with cutting-edge discoveries.

In conclusion, "The Logic of the Classical Language - Masticationpedia" presents a compelling vision of a future where the fusion of computational logic, advanced technology, and medical science heralds a new era of diagnostics and patient care. It champions a paradigm where medical language, enriched by the relentless progression of scientific knowledge, leads to unparalleled precision in diagnostics and a more effective, personalized approach to treatment, setting a new standard in patient care, particularly within the specialized field of craniofacial biology.  

Masticationpedia

 

Introduction

In the previous chapter, dedicated to the "Logic of Medical Language", we aimed to shift the focus from symptoms or clinical signs to an encrypted machine language. In this context, the arguments of Donald E. Stanley, Daniel G. Campos, and Pat Croskerry are particularly pertinent, especially when connected to the concept of time as an information vector (anticipating the symptom) and to the consideration of the message as a machine language rather than a verbal language). [1][2]

However, this does not lessen the importance of the clinical history, established on a pseudo-formal verbal language, which has now firmly entrenched itself in clinical practice and has proven its diagnostic effectiveness. Our aim in emphasizing a machine language and the system is merely to provide an additional opportunity to validate Medical-Diagnostic Science. We are fully aware that our "Linux Sapiens" remains puzzled by what has been anticipated and continues to ponder.

«Could the logic of classical language help us solve the dilemma of poor Mary Poppins?»
(A bit of patience, please)

We cannot limit ourselves to providing a conventional answer, as science progresses not through baseless assertions but through questions and reflections that have passed the scrutiny of scientific validation. This compels us to explore and give voice to thoughts, perplexities, and doubts raised by certain key concepts discussed in various scientific articles.

Among these critical topics is "Craniofacial Biology".

We begin with an influential study by Townsend and Brook, [3] in which the authors challenge the current research paradigm, both theoretical and applied, in "Craniofacial Biology", aiming to derive clinical considerations and implications. One aspect they address is the "Interdisciplinary Approach", through which Geoffrey Sperber and his son Steven recognized the potential for exponential growth in the field of "Craniofacial Biology" due to technological innovations such as gene sequencing, CT scans, MRI imaging, laser scanning, image analysis, ultrasound, and spectroscopy. [4]

Another topic of significant interest within 'Craniofacial Biology' is the recognition that biological systems are considered 'Complex Systems'. [5] 'Epigenetics' also plays a fundamental role in craniofacial molecular biology. Researchers from Adelaide and Sydney have provided an in-depth critique in the field of epigenetics, with a particular focus on dental and craniofacial disciplines. [6] Phenomics, in particular, explored by these authors (see Phenomics), is a research area dedicated to measuring changes in teeth and associated orofacial structures resulting from interactions between genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors during development. [7] In this context, it is crucial to mention the work of Irma Thesleff from Helsinki, Finland, who highlighted the existence of numerous transient signaling centers in the dental epithelium that play key roles in the tooth development program. [8]

Additionally, the works by Peterkova R., Hovorakova M., Peterka M., and Lesot H., offer a fascinating overview of the processes involved in dental development. [9][10][11] For completeness, the studies by Han J., Menicanin D., Gronthos S., and Bartold P.M., which have explored a wide range of research on stem cells, tissue engineering, and periodontal regeneration, cannot be omitted. [12]

This review necessarily included discussions on genetic, epigenetic, and environmental influences that, during morphogenesis, lead to variations in the number, size, and shape of teeth, [13][14] as well as on the effect of tongue pressure on growth and craniofacial functions. [15][16] Furthermore, special mention is deserved for the exceptional work of Townsend and Brook, whose content aligns well with the reflections of another prominent author, HC Slavkin. Slavkin [17]asserts:

The future holds countless opportunities to significantly improve the clinical outcomes of both congenital and acquired craniofacial malformations. Clinicians play a crucial role, as critical thinking combined with clinical experience greatly enhances diagnostic accuracy, and consequently, health outcomes.

«I understand the progress of Science described by the authors but I do not understand the change in thought»
(Let me give you a practical example)

In the "Introduction", we raised some issues related to malocclusion. In this context, we examine the logic of the medical language used by the dentist when faced with the clinical case described in the "Introductory Chapter", including diagnostic and therapeutic conclusions.

The patient has a unilateral posterior crossbite and an anterior open bite. [18]The crossbite represents a deviation from normal occlusion [19] and is therefore treated concurrently with the open bite. [20][21] This reasoning suggests that the model (masticatory system) is 'normalized to occlusion'; inversely interpreted, it implies that an occlusal discrepancy is a cause of malocclusion, that is, a disorder of the Masticatory System. Hence, an intervention to restore proper masticatory function is justified. (Figure 1a).


This example is the classical logic language, as we will explain in detail, but now a doubt arises:

At the time of formulating the orthodontic and orthognathic axioms, which led to the creation of protocols ratified by the International Scientific Community, were the information discussed in the introduction to this chapter already known?

Certainly not, as the time is a vector of information. However, despite this cognitive limitation, we proceed by adopting a classic language logic that raises relevant issues for citizen safety.

«this statement seems a bit risky to me!»
(sure, but the logical sequence has already been anticipated)

If this case were analyzed through a mentality oriented towards a 'system language logic', which we will discuss in a dedicated chapter, the conclusions could be surprising.

Analyzing the electrophysiological responses obtained from the patient with malocclusion, represented in figures 1b, 1c, and 1d (with explanations provided directly in the captions to facilitate the debate), it clearly emerges that these data lead us to considerations quite different from the simple 'Malocclusion'. Therefore, the orthodontic and orthognathic axioms based on a 'cause/effect' relationship show a significant conceptual gap.


«So, how does the classic language logic connect to this context?»
(The contrast with the "system language logic" highlights the interpretive limits of traditional approaches to malocclusion. This suggests that orthodontic models of cause/effect might need a critical review in light of new electrophysiological evidence.)

Mathematical Formalism

In this chapter, we will revisit the clinical case of Mary Poppins, who has been suffering from Orofacial Pain for over ten years, with a diagnosis of "Temporomandibular Disorder" (TMD) confirmed by her dentist, or, more specifically, Orofacial Pain associated with TMD. To understand the complexity in arriving at a precise diagnostic definition using Classic Language Logic, it is fundamental to introduce and analyze the concept at the basis of the philosophy of classical language.

Propositions

"The simplest propositions can be combined with each other to form new and more complex propositions through the use of logical operators and quantifier connectors. These tools of logic allow us to construct broader statements starting from basic concepts, thus facilitating the formulation of theorems and proofs in mathematics and other disciplines that require precision and rigor.

The fundamental logical operators include:

  • Conjunction, denoted by the symbol (and): represents the logical operation "AND". A compound proposition formed by two propositions joined with "and" is true only if both propositions are true.
  • Disjunction, denoted by the symbol (or): represents the logical operation "OR". A compound proposition is true if at least one of the component propositions is true.
  • Negation, denoted by the symbol (not): reverses the truth value of a proposition. If a proposition is true, its negation is false, and vice versa.
  • Implication, denoted by the symbol ⇒ (if... then): expresses a conditional relationship between two propositions. If the antecedent (first proposition) is true, then the consequent (second proposition) must be true for the implication to be true.
  • Logical consequence, denoted by the symbol (it follows that): indicates that a proposition is a logical consequence of the previous ones within a given logical system.
  • Universal quantifier, denoted by the symbol (for all): expresses that the following proposition is true for all elements of a certain set.
  • Proof, often indicated by reasonings that lead to the conclusion symbolized with (thus): indicates the culmination of an argument or logical reasoning that leads to a conclusion.
  • Membership, denoted by the symbol (belongs to) or (does not belong to): used to indicate whether an element belongs or does not belong to a set.

Quantifier connectors, such as the universal quantifier () and the existential quantifier (), allow for extending statements to sets of elements, offering a way to express propositions concerning 'all elements' of a certain set or 'at least one element' of such a set.

By combining these tools, it is possible to construct complex propositions that serve as the foundation for logical arguments and mathematical reasoning, eliminating the ambiguities typical of common language and providing a clear structure for analysis and proof".......................

Strategic dental topics for authors to subscribe an article

Classical Logic, Craniofacial Biology, Advanced Technologies, Medical Diagnostics, Epigenetics, Phenomics, Treatment Personalization, Craniofacial Anomalies, Formal Logic, Interdisciplinary Approach, Medical Innovations, Personalized Treatments, Computational Logic, Precision Diagnostics.

Bibliography & references
  1. Stanley DE, Campos DG, «The logic of medical diagnosis», in Perspect Biol Med, 2013».
    PMID:23974509
    DOI:10.1353/pbm.2013.0019 
  2. Croskerry P, «Adaptive expertise in medical decision making», in Med Teach, 2018».
    PMID:30033794
    DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484898 
  3. Townsend GC, Brook AH, «The face, the future, and dental practice: how research in craniofacial biology will influence patient care», in Aust Dent J, Australian Dental Association, 2014».
    PMID:24646132
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12157 
  4. Sperber GH, Sperber SM, «The genesis of craniofacial biology as a health science discipline», in Aust Dent J, Australian Dental Association, 2014».
    PMID:24495071
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12131 
  5. Brook AH, Brook O'Donnell M, Hone A, Hart E, Hughes TE, Smith RN, Townsend GC, «General and craniofacial development are complex adaptive processes influenced by diversity», in Aust Dent J, Australian Dental Association, 2014».
    PMID:24617813
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12158 
  6. Williams SD, Hughes TE, Adler CJ, Brook AH, Townsend GC, «Epigenetics: a new frontier in dentistry», in Aust Dent J, Australian Dental Association, 2014».
    PMID:24611746
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12155 
  7. Yong R, Ranjitkar S, Townsend GC, Brook AH, Smith RN, Evans AR, Hughes TE, Lekkas D, «Dental phenomics: advancing genotype to phenotype correlations in craniofacial research», in Aust Dent J, Australian Dental Association, 2014».
    PMID:24611797
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12156 
  8. Thesleff I, «Current understanding of the process of tooth formation: transfer from the laboratory to the clinic», in Aust Dent J, 2013».
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12102 
  9. Peterkova R, Hovorakova M, Peterka M, Lesot H, «Three‐dimensional analysis of the early development of the dentition», in Aust Dent J, Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Dental Association, 2014».
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12130 
  10. Lesot H, Hovorakova M, Peterka M, Peterkova R, «Three‐dimensional analysis of molar development in the mouse from the cap to bell stage», in Aust Dent J, 2014».
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12132 
  11. Hughes TE, Townsend GC, Pinkerton SK, Bockmann MR, Seow WK, Brook AH, Richards LC, Mihailidis S, Ranjitkar S, Lekkas D, «The teeth and faces of twins: providing insights into dentofacial development and oral health for practising oral health professionals», in Aust Dent J, 2013».
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12101 
  12. Han J, Menicanin D, Gronthos S, Bartold PM, «Stem cells, tissue engineering and periodontal regeneration», in Aust Dent J, 2013».
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12100 
  13. {{Cite book | autore = Brook AH | autore2 = Jernvall J | autore3 = Smith RN | autore4 = Hughes TE | autore5 = Townsend GC | titolo = The Dentition: The Outcomes of Morphogenesis Leading to Variations of Tooth Number, Size and Shape | url = https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.12160 | volume = | opera = Aust Dent J | anno = 2014 | editore = | città = | ISBN = | PMID = | PMCID = | DOI = 10.1111/adj.12160 | oaf = | LCCN = | OCLC =
  14. Seow WK, «Developmental defects of enamel and dentine: challenges for basic science research and clinical management», in Aust Dent J, 2014».
    PMID:24164394
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12104 
  15. Kieser JA, Farland MG, Jack H, Farella M, Wang Y, Rohrle O, «The role of oral soft tissues in swallowing function: what can tongue pressure tell us?», in Aust Dent J, 2013».
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12103 
  16. Slavkin HC, «Research on Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology: Implications for the Future of Academic Dentistry», in J Dent Educ, 1983».
    PMID:6573384 
  17. Slavkin HC, «The Future of Research in Craniofacial Biology and What This Will Mean for Oral Health Professional Education and Clinical Practice», in Aust Dent J, 2014».
    PMID:24433547
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12105 
  18. Littlewood SJ, Kandasamy S, Huang G, «Retention and relapse in clinical practice», in Aust Dent J, 2017».
    DOI:10.1111/adj.12475 
  19. Miamoto CB, Silva Marques L, Abreu LG, Paiva SM, «Impact of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite on children’s quality of life», in Dental Press J Orthod, 2018». 
  20. Alachioti XS, Dimopoulou E, Vlasakidou A, Athanasiou AE, «Amelogenesis imperfecta and anterior open bite: Etiological, classification, clinical and management interrelationships», in J Orthod Sci, 2014».
    DOI:10.4103/2278-0203.127547 
  21. Mizrahi E, «A review of anterior open bite», in Br J Orthod, 1978».
    PMID:284793
    DOI:10.1179/bjo.5.1.21