Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
11,183
edits
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:Recovery cycle.jpeg|left|frameless|300x300px]] | [[File:Recovery cycle.jpeg|left|frameless|300x300px]] | ||
The | The patient analyzed is a 32-year-old male suffering from marked nocturnal and diurnal bruxism, accompanied by orofacial pain (OP) predominantly in the temporoparietal regions. This pain is more intense and frequent on the left side of the face. The complexity of the symptoms led to the adoption of an advanced diagnostic approach using the Masticationpedia model. | ||
{{ArtBy| | The Masticationpedia model enabled the decryption of the "machine language" of the central nervous system, focusing on hyperexcitability, particularly in the mesencephalic trigeminal area. The analysis was supported by the electrophysiological method known as the "Recovery Cycle of the Inhibitory Masseter Reflex," which revealed an exaggerated recovery of the silent period following the second electrical stimulus. This type of response indicates hyperactivity in the central nervous system, a condition that extends beyond the simple dental management of bruxism. | ||
Due to the abnormalities detected in the recovery cycle, an MRI of the brain was performed. The examination highlighted the presence of a cavernous formation in the region of the pineal gland, known as "Pineal Cavernoma." This finding significantly directed the diagnosis toward more complex neurological causes of bruxism. | |||
In this patient's case, bruxism is not interpreted as a disorder confined to dental functions but as a sign of functional and organic instability at the level of the nervous system. The Masticationpedia model emphasized how the conventional approach to bruxism might not be sufficient unless integrated with a more detailed analysis of the patient's neurological state. | |||
The management of bruxism, often considered within the exclusive scope of dentistry, in this case, requires integration with neurology due to the presence of alterations in the central nervous system highlighted by the recovery cycle of the inhibitory masseter reflex. The hyperexcitability of the trigeminal system suggests dysfunction in the inhibitory circuits of the brainstem, a condition that might be unrecognized without the use of advanced diagnostic techniques employed in the Masticationpedia model. | |||
The studied case illustrates the importance of integrated diagnosis in neurology and dentistry to treat conditions like bruxism, which may have deep roots in central neurological dysfunctions. The presence of the pineal cavernoma, in particular, emphasizes the need to explore therapeutic approaches that consider the neural health of the patient as much as dental health. | |||
This summary outlines the diagnostic pathway and clinical implications of the case, highlighting how the integration between medical specializations is crucial for managing disorders that present symptoms in areas as seemingly unrelated as bruxism and orofacial pain.<blockquote> | |||
== Keywords == | |||
'''Bruxism''' - Refers to the medical condition involving excessive teeth grinding or jaw clenching, which is central to the patient's symptoms in the case study. | |||
'''Orofacial Pain (OP)''' - Denotes pain felt in the face and oral areas, particularly relevant as the patient suffers from pain predominantly in the temporoparietal regions. | |||
'''Masticationpedia Diagnostic Model''' - A specialized diagnostic approach used in the case to decrypt the machine language of the central nervous system, highlighting its advanced methodology for diagnosing complex neurological conditions related to dental symptoms. | |||
'''Hyperexcitability of Central Nervous System''' - Key phrase describing the neurological state that exacerbates or influences conditions like bruxism, derived from the electrophysiological findings in the study. | |||
'''Recovery Cycle of the Inhibitory Masseter Reflex''' - An electrophysiological method used to diagnose the neural aspects of bruxism in the patient, important for its role in revealing abnormal neural function. | |||
'''Pineal Cavernoma''' - A specific type of brain tumor found in the patient's pineal gland, critical for understanding the neurological underpinnings of his symptoms. | |||
'''MRI of the Brain''' - Describes the medical imaging technique used to discover the pineal cavernoma, essential for diagnosing deep-seated neurological disorders. | |||
'''Neurological Diagnosis of Bruxism''' - Combines the dental condition with its neurological assessment, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment. | |||
'''Central Nervous System Disorders''' - Broad category that encompasses various conditions including those affecting the trigeminal system, which are relevant to this case study. | |||
'''Inhibitory Circuits of Brainstem''' - Related to the findings from the Recovery Cycle test, this keyword focuses on the part of the nervous system involved in the regulation of motor and sensory information, which is dysfunctional in the patient.</blockquote>{{ArtBy| | |||
| autore = Gianni Frisardi | | autore = Gianni Frisardi | ||
| autore2 = Giorgio Cruccu | | autore2 = Giorgio Cruccu | ||
Line 13: | Line 43: | ||
| autore6 = | | autore6 = | ||
| }} | | }} | ||
=== Introduction === | ===Introduction=== | ||
We have therefore reached the section of the Cognitive Neural Network' abbreviated to 'RNC' presented for the diagnosis of the case of our 'Mary Poppins' in the chapter 'Encrypted code: Ephaptic transmission' and which we will propose again as a diagnostic model to accustom the reader to the procedure , simple, intuitive but essential in clinical cases of complex diagnosis such as our patient 'Bruxer'. Our starting point, therefore, is the point of arrival of the phase preceding the 'RNC', ie the discriminatory phase of the contexts ('''<math>\tau</math>''' Coherence Demarcator). The low diagnostic weight derived from the neurological assertions <math>\Im_n\cup0,33 | We have therefore reached the section of the Cognitive Neural Network' abbreviated to 'RNC' presented for the diagnosis of the case of our 'Mary Poppins' in the chapter 'Encrypted code: Ephaptic transmission' and which we will propose again as a diagnostic model to accustom the reader to the procedure , simple, intuitive but essential in clinical cases of complex diagnosis such as our patient 'Bruxer'. Our starting point, therefore, is the point of arrival of the phase preceding the 'RNC', ie the discriminatory phase of the contexts ('''<math>\tau</math>''' Coherence Demarcator). The low diagnostic weight derived from the neurological assertions <math>\Im_n\cup0,33 | ||
</math>, in fact, refers only to a modest difference in the amplitude of the jaw jerk. Also in this case the Cognitive Neural Network (CNN) can help us to focus the machine language code and decrypt it. We therefore follow the same procedure already described extensively in the chapter '[[Encrypted code: Ephaptic transmission - it|Encrypted code: Ephaptic transmission]]' and we will have the following result: | </math>, in fact, refers only to a modest difference in the amplitude of the jaw jerk. Also in this case the Cognitive Neural Network (CNN) can help us to focus the machine language code and decrypt it. We therefore follow the same procedure already described extensively in the chapter '[[Encrypted code: Ephaptic transmission - it|Encrypted code: Ephaptic transmission]]' and we will have the following result: | ||
Line 20: | Line 50: | ||
<math>CNN=\sum ( </math> [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism+ Bruxism] (4398), [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism+AND+trigeminal+system+&ac=yes&cauthor_id=None&user_filter=&schema=none&page=1&whatsnew=None&show_snippets=on&format=summary&sort=relevance&sort_order=desc&size=10 trigeminal system] (29), [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism+AND+trigeminal+system+AND+abnormal+&ac=yes&cauthor_id=None&user_filter=&schema=none&page=1&whatsnew=None&show_snippets=on&format=summary&sort=relevance&sort_order=desc&size=10 abnormality] ( 5), [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism%20AND%20trigeminal%20system%20AND%20abnormal%20AND%20excitability excitability] ( 3)<math>\longrightarrow</math>The excitability of the trigeminal motor system in sleep bruxism: a transcranial magnetic stimulation and brainstem reflex study </blockquote> | <math>CNN=\sum ( </math> [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism+ Bruxism] (4398), [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism+AND+trigeminal+system+&ac=yes&cauthor_id=None&user_filter=&schema=none&page=1&whatsnew=None&show_snippets=on&format=summary&sort=relevance&sort_order=desc&size=10 trigeminal system] (29), [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism+AND+trigeminal+system+AND+abnormal+&ac=yes&cauthor_id=None&user_filter=&schema=none&page=1&whatsnew=None&show_snippets=on&format=summary&sort=relevance&sort_order=desc&size=10 abnormality] ( 5), [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism%20AND%20trigeminal%20system%20AND%20abnormal%20AND%20excitability excitability] ( 3)<math>\longrightarrow</math>The excitability of the trigeminal motor system in sleep bruxism: a transcranial magnetic stimulation and brainstem reflex study </blockquote> | ||
=== Diagnostic sequences === | ===Diagnostic sequences=== | ||
====1st Step: CNN Sequence ==== | ====1st Step: CNN Sequence==== | ||
*'''''<math>\tau</math>''' Coherence Demarcator:'' As we have previously described, the first step is an initialization command of the network analysis which derives, in fact, from a previous cognitive elaboration of the assertions in the dental context <math>\delta_n</math> and the neurological one <math>\gamma_n</math> to which the ' <math>\tau</math> Coherence Demarcator' has given an absolute weight effectively eliminating the dental context <math>\delta_n</math> from the process. From what emerges from the neurological statements <math>\gamma_n</math> the 'State' of the Trigeminal Nervous System appears relatively asymmetrical in amplitude for the jaw jerk, given an average of <math>\Im_n\cup0,33 | *'''''<math>\tau</math>''' Coherence Demarcator:'' As we have previously described, the first step is an initialization command of the network analysis which derives, in fact, from a previous cognitive elaboration of the assertions in the dental context <math>\delta_n</math> and the neurological one <math>\gamma_n</math> to which the ' <math>\tau</math> Coherence Demarcator' has given an absolute weight effectively eliminating the dental context <math>\delta_n</math> from the process. From what emerges from the neurological statements <math>\gamma_n</math> the 'State' of the Trigeminal Nervous System appears relatively asymmetrical in amplitude for the jaw jerk, given an average of <math>\Im_n\cup0,33 | ||
</math>. This does not allow the initial purely neurologica<nowiki/>l command to be entered in the Pubmed database as was performed for the previous clinical case of Mary Poppins. The initialization command will therefore be '[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism+ Bruxism]' which will concern both data samples (dental and neurological). | </math>. This does not allow the initial purely neurologica<nowiki/>l command to be entered in the Pubmed database as was performed for the previous clinical case of Mary Poppins. The initialization command will therefore be '[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Bruxism+ Bruxism]' which will concern both data samples (dental and neurological). | ||
Line 30: | Line 60: | ||
{{Q2|Also in this clinical case it is clear that the term 'Bruxism' is only a conventional term in an ambiguous and vague verbal language while the term 'Hyperexcitability' is a decrypted machine language.}} | {{Q2|Also in this clinical case it is clear that the term 'Bruxism' is only a conventional term in an ambiguous and vague verbal language while the term 'Hyperexcitability' is a decrypted machine language.}} | ||
==== 2nd Step: Recovery cycle of the Inhibitory Masseter Reflex ==== | ==== 2nd Step: Recovery cycle of the Inhibitory Masseter Reflex==== | ||
The recovery cycle of the Inhibitory Masseter Reflex (<sub>rc</sub>MIR) was studied by generating pairs of stimuli with identical characteristics, delivered percutaneously with a bipolar electrical stimulator positioned on the patient's face in the area of the mental nerve. The stimulation was produced using square wave electrical impulses, capable of evoking a well-defined inhibitory reflex composed of two silent periods (SP), called SP1 and SP2, separated by an interval of recovery of the EMG "Interposed Activity" ( IA). The first stimulus (S1) was considered as a conditioning stimulus and the second (S2) as a test stimulus. The inter-stimulus interval between S1 and S2 was set at 150 ms. | The recovery cycle of the Inhibitory Masseter Reflex (<sub>rc</sub>MIR) was studied by generating pairs of stimuli with identical characteristics, delivered percutaneously with a bipolar electrical stimulator positioned on the patient's face in the area of the mental nerve. The stimulation was produced using square wave electrical impulses, capable of evoking a well-defined inhibitory reflex composed of two silent periods (SP), called SP1 and SP2, separated by an interval of recovery of the EMG "Interposed Activity" ( IA). The first stimulus (S1) was considered as a conditioning stimulus and the second (S2) as a test stimulus. The inter-stimulus interval between S1 and S2 was set at 150 ms. | ||
Line 42: | Line 72: | ||
*The S1 stimulus splits the acquisition into pre and post analysis and generates the SPs and the AI. | *The S1 stimulus splits the acquisition into pre and post analysis and generates the SPs and the AI. | ||
*The stimulus S2 delivered 150 ms from S1, called interstimulus (IS), evokes the second SP sequence and the IA. | *The stimulus S2 delivered 150 ms from S1, called interstimulus (IS), evokes the second SP sequence and the IA. | ||
*The SP of S1 and S2 are determined automatically by the software which positions the markers on the first and last minimum value elaborated on the traces for the generation of SP1 and SP2, and contextually calculates their duration. The IA duration is calculated between the last minimum value of SP1 and the first minimum value of SP2. | *The SP of S1 and S2 are determined automatically by the software which positions the markers on the first and last minimum value elaborated on the traces for the generation of SP1 and SP2, and contextually calculates their duration. The IA duration is calculated between the last minimum value of SP1 and the first minimum value of SP2. | ||
Line 52: | Line 82: | ||
! colspan="5" |Tabella 1 | ! colspan="5" |Tabella 1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="5" | Description of the positioning and measurements of the markers | | colspan="5" |Description of the positioning and measurements of the markers | ||
for the recovery cycle of the Masseter Inhibitory Reflex ( rc MIR) | for the recovery cycle of the Masseter Inhibitory Reflex ( rc MIR) | ||
Line 58: | Line 88: | ||
| | | | ||
| colspan="2" |S1 | | colspan="2" |S1 | ||
| colspan="2" | S2 | | colspan="2" |S2 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''EMG''' | |'''EMG''' | ||
Line 67: | Line 97: | ||
|'''Markers''' | |'''Markers''' | ||
|'''Onset latency''' | |'''Onset latency''' | ||
'''S1 (msec)''' | '''S1 (msec)''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| 1A | |1A | ||
|11 | |11 | ||
|1E | |1E | ||
|12 | |12 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Ch1 | |Ch1 | ||
Right masseter muscle | Right masseter muscle | ||
|1B | |1B | ||
|24 | | 24 | ||
|1F | |1F | ||
|24 | |24 | ||
Line 84: | Line 114: | ||
| | | | ||
|1C | |1C | ||
|47 | |47 | ||
| 1G | |1G | ||
|37 | | 37 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
|1D | | 1D | ||
| 86 | |86 | ||
|1H | | 1H | ||
|98 | | 98 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="5" | | | colspan="5" | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| 2A | |2A | ||
| 10 | |10 | ||
|2E | |2E | ||
| 13 | |13 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ch2 | |Ch2 | ||
Left masseter muscle | Left masseter muscle | ||
|2B | |2B | ||
|26 | |26 | ||
|2F | |2F | ||
|27 | |27 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
Line 118: | Line 148: | ||
| 2D | | 2D | ||
|91 | |91 | ||
|2H | | 2H | ||
|98 | |98 | ||
|} | |} | ||
</Center>{{Q2|The test showed a high speed of recovery of the synaptic responses of the trigeminal system, index of neuronal hyperexcitability. This led the clinician to urgently request an MRI of the brain to define the correct diagnosis.}} | </Center>{{Q2|The test showed a high speed of recovery of the synaptic responses of the trigeminal system, index of neuronal hyperexcitability. This led the clinician to urgently request an MRI of the brain to define the correct diagnosis.}} | ||
==== 3rd Step: brain MNR ==== | ====3rd Step: brain MNR ==== | ||
MRI of the brain, using Turbo Spin Echo, Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery, and Gradient Echo sequences, was conducted before and after intravenous administration of contrast medium. Results showed the presence of a roundish area of approximately 1.5 cm in diameter located in the vicinity of the quadrigeminal cistern at the level of the pineal gland. There was also a slight dilation of the supratentorial ventricular system, which appeared in the axis and was most evident in the proximity of the temporal horns, with a periventricular rim with a transependymal fluid absorption phenomenon.<ref>Peter H Yang, Alison Almgren-Bell, Hongjie Gu, Anna V Dowling, Sangami Pugazenthi, Kimberly Mackey, Esther B Dupépé, Jennifer M Strahle. Etiology- and region-specific characteristics of transependymal cerebrospinal fluid flow. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022 Aug 12;1-11. doi: 10.3171/2022.7.PEDS2246. Online ahead of print.</ref> The signal characteristics of the formation suggested a provisional diagnosis of pineal cavernoma. (Figures 2 and 3) | MRI of the brain, using Turbo Spin Echo, Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery, and Gradient Echo sequences, was conducted before and after intravenous administration of contrast medium. Results showed the presence of a roundish area of approximately 1.5 cm in diameter located in the vicinity of the quadrigeminal cistern at the level of the pineal gland. There was also a slight dilation of the supratentorial ventricular system, which appeared in the axis and was most evident in the proximity of the temporal horns, with a periventricular rim with a transependymal fluid absorption phenomenon.<ref>Peter H Yang, Alison Almgren-Bell, Hongjie Gu, Anna V Dowling, Sangami Pugazenthi, Kimberly Mackey, Esther B Dupépé, Jennifer M Strahle. Etiology- and region-specific characteristics of transependymal cerebrospinal fluid flow. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022 Aug 12;1-11. doi: 10.3171/2022.7.PEDS2246. Online ahead of print.</ref> The signal characteristics of the formation suggested a provisional diagnosis of pineal cavernoma. (Figures 2 and 3) | ||
Line 153: | Line 183: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2" | | | colspan="2" | | ||
{| | {| | ||
|+{{Q2|In honor of Prof. Albino Bricolo neurosurgeon who saved the life of our patient 'Bruxer'}} | |+{{Q2|In honor of Prof. Albino Bricolo neurosurgeon who saved the life of our patient 'Bruxer'}} | ||
| | | | ||
| [[File:Pineal cavernoma pre surgery 1.jpeg|thumb|150x150px|Pre-surgical axial MR]] | |[[File:Pineal cavernoma pre surgery 1.jpeg|thumb|150x150px|Pre-surgical axial MR]] | ||
| [[File:Pineal cavernoma post surgery 1.jpeg|thumb|155x155px|Post-surgical axial MR]] | |[[File:Pineal cavernoma post surgery 1.jpeg|thumb|155x155px|Post-surgical axial MR]] | ||
|[[File:Pineal cavernoma pre surgery 2.jpg|thumb|150x150px|Pre-surgical sagittal MR]] | |[[File:Pineal cavernoma pre surgery 2.jpg|thumb|150x150px|Pre-surgical sagittal MR]] | ||
| [[File:Pienal cavernoma post surgery 2.jpeg|thumb|143x143px|Post-surgical sagittal MR]] | |[[File:Pienal cavernoma post surgery 2.jpeg|thumb|143x143px|Post-surgical sagittal MR]] | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} |
edits