Difference between revisions of "Logic of medical language"

<!--119-->First of all: <!--120-->Only the patient is unconsciously aware of the disease that afflicts his own system, but he does not have the ability to transduce the signal from the machine language to the verbal language. The same procedure occurs in 'Systems Control Theory', in which a dynamic control procedure called ‘State Observer’ is designed to estimate the state of the system from output measurements. Matter of fact, in the control theory, observability is a measure of how much the internal state of a system can be deduced from the knowledge of its external outputs<ref>[[wikipedia:Observability|Osservability]] </ref>.  <!--121-->While in the case of a biological system a ‘Stochastic Observability’ of linear dynamic systemsis preferred<ref>{{cita libro  

  }}</ref>, <!--122-->the Gramian matrices are used for the stochastic observability of nonlinear systems<ref>[[wikipedia:Controllability_Gramian|Controllability Gramian]]</ref><ref>{{cita libro  

  }}</ref>.    

<!--123-->This would already be enough to bring now our attention on an extraordinarily explanatory phenomenon called ''<!--124-->Gate Control''. <!--125-->If a child gets hit in the leg while playing soccer, in addition to crying, the first thing he does is to rub extensively the painful area so that the pain decreases. <!--126-->The child does not know the ‘Gate Control’, but unconsciously activates an action that, by stimulating the tactile receptors, closes the gate at the entrance of the nociceptive input of the C fibres, consequently decreasing the pain; the phenomenon was discovered only in 1965 by Ronald Melzack and Patrick Wall<ref>{{cita libro  

<!--127-->As much as in computers, encryption-decryption also takes place in biology. In fact, in a recent research the authors examined the influence of molecular mechanisms of the ‘long-term potentiation’ (LTP) phenomenon in the hippocampus on the functional importance of synaptic plasticity for storage of information and the development of neuronal connectivity. <!--128-->It is not yet clear if the activity modifies the strength of the single synapses in a digital ('''01''', all or nothing) or analog (graduated) way. <!--129-->In the study it emerges that individual synapses appear to have an 'all or nothing' enhancement, indicative of highly cooperative processes, but different thresholds for undergoing enhancement. These findings raise the possibility that some forms of synaptic memory may be digitally stored in the brain<ref>{{cite book  

  }}</ref>.

==<!--130-->Decryption ==

<math>133755457655037A  </math>

<br /><!--133-->Let's pretend that we are Martians in possession of the right key (algorithm or context) the A key that corresponds to the 'Real Context'. We would be able to perfectly decrypt the message, as you can verify by entering the code in the appropriate window:  

<!--134-->But, luckily or not, we are not Martians, so we will use, contextually to the information acquired from the social and scientific context, the dental key that correspond to B key, with the consequent decryption of the message into: 

 

 

<!--135-->Using the C key that corresponds to the neurological context, the decryption of the message would be:  

{{q2|26k81n_g+|}}

<!--136-->These are extraordinarily interesting elements of language logic, and please note that the encrypted message of the real context ‘meaning’ of the ‘disease’, the A key, is totally different from the one encrypted through the B keys and the C key: they are constructed in conventionally different contexts, while there is only one reality and this indicates a hypothetical '''diagnostic error'''.

<!--137-->This means that medical language logics mainly built on an extension of verbal language, are not very efficient in being quick and detailed in diagnostics, especially the differential one. This is because the distortion due to the ambiguity and semantic vagueness of the linguistic expression, called ‘vagueness epistemic’ or ‘epistemic uncertainty’, or better ‘uncertain knowledge’, forcibly directs the diagnosis towards the '''specialist reference context''' and not on the exact and real one.  

{{q2|<!--138-->Why, then, are we relatively successful in diagnostics? |<!--139-->An entire separate encyclopedia would be needed to answer to this question, but without going too far, let's try to discuss the reasons.}}

<!--140-->Basic diagnostic intuition is a quick, non-analytical and unconscious way of reasoning. <!--141-->A small body of evidence indicates the ubiquity of intuition and its usefulness in generating diagnostic hypotheses and ascertaining the severity of the disease. Little is known about how experienced doctors understand this phenomenon, and about how they work with it in clinical practice. <!--142-->Most reports of the physician’s diagnostic intuition have linked this phenomenon to non-analytical reasoning and have emphasized the importance of experience in developing a reliable sense of intuition that can be used to effectively engage analytical reasoning in order to evaluate the clinical evidence. <!--143-->In a recent study, the authors conclude that clinicians perceive clinical intuition as useful for correcting and advancing diagnoses of both common and rare conditions<ref>{{cite book  

  }}</ref>

<!--182-->It should also be noted that the Biological System sends a uniquely integrated encrypted message to the outside, in the sense that each piece of code will have a precise meaning when individually taken, while if combined with all the others it will generate the complete code corresponding to the real message, that is to "Efapsi".

{{q2|Ef+£2|}}

<!--184-->This outcome comes from the deletion of the last two elements of the originating code: <math>13375545765503</math> <!--185-->resulting from <math>133755457655037A</math>. <!--186-->So, part of the code is decrypted ('''Ef''') while the rest remains encrypted and the conclusion speaks for itself: it is not enough to identify a series of specific tests, yet it is necessary to know how to tie them together in a specific way in order to complete the real concept and build the diagnosis.

<!--144-->Therefore, there is a need for: