Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
10,785
edits
Difference between revisions of "Introduction"
no edit summary
| Line 294: | Line 294: | ||
==Anomaly ''vs.'' Interdisciplinarity == | ==Anomaly ''vs.'' Interdisciplinarity == | ||
A superficial view might suggest that the epistemic evolution of science is marked by an apparent opposition between the aspects of disciplinarity, highlighted by the "Physics Paradigm of Science" (which sheds light on anomalies), and those of interdisciplinarity, represented by the "Engineering Paradigm of Science" (and the related concept of metacognitive scaffold). However, as will be explored in this chapter, these two perspectives are not actually in conflict; on the contrary, they prove to be complementary, as both contribute to the generation of a "Paradigmatic Innovation" without any form of conflict. | |||
It could then be argued that "Innovations" themselves represent "Progresses of Science," as illustrated in the article "Scientific Bases of Dentistry" by Yegane Guven. This work explores the impact of biological and digital revolutions on education and daily clinical practice in dentistry, covering topics such as personalized regenerative dentistry, nanotechnologies, virtual reality simulations, genomic information, and stem cell research.<ref>{{cita libro | |||
| autore = Guven Y | | autore = Guven Y | ||
| titolo = Scientific basis of dentistry | | titolo = Scientific basis of dentistry | ||
| Line 309: | Line 309: | ||
| DOI = 10.17096/jiufd.04646 | | DOI = 10.17096/jiufd.04646 | ||
| OCLC = | | OCLC = | ||
}} 51(3): 64–71. Published online 2017 Oct 2. PMCID: PMC5624148 - PMID: 29114433 </ref> | }} 51(3): 64–71. Published online 2017 Oct 2. PMCID: PMC5624148 - PMID: 29114433 </ref> Although the innovations mentioned are technological and methodological in nature, it is crucial to recognize that true scientific progress does not occur exclusively through "Incremental Innovations" or "Radical Innovations," but is fundamentally achieved through "Paradigmatic Innovations." | ||
In the strictest sense of the | In the strictest sense of the term, "Paradigmatic Innovations" are a change in thinking and awareness that spreads throughout all of humanity, affecting different social layers, from the Copernican revolution to the recent trend of approaching biological phenomena with a stochastic method.<ref>{{cita libro | ||
| autore = Zhao XF | | autore = Zhao XF | ||
| autore2 = Gojo I | | autore2 = Gojo I | ||
| Line 328: | Line 328: | ||
| DOI = | | DOI = | ||
| OCLC = | | OCLC = | ||
}} Prepublished online 2009 Oct 10. PMCID: PMC2776262 - PMID: 19918331. 3(1): 75–86.</ref> | }} Prepublished online 2009 Oct 10. PMCID: PMC2776262 - PMID: 19918331. 3(1): 75–86.</ref> | ||
This epistemological context, which includes initiatives such as the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), Evidence-Based Medicine, and others, is further explored in the Masticationpedia project. The latter aims to highlight the dynamics and dialectics of progress in the science of masticatory rehabilitations, emphasizing the anomalies that stimulate a change in thought and, consequently, a "Paradigmatic Innovation." | |||
Before | Before proceeding, it might be appropriate to observe a very concrete and significant case. | ||
==Malocclusion== | ==Malocclusion== | ||
"Malocclusion" derives from the Latin "malum," meaning "bad" or "wrong," and literally refers to an improper closure of the teeth.<ref>The creation of the term is generally attributed to [[:wpen:Edward Angle|Edward Angle]], considered the father of modern orthodontics, who coined it as a specification of ''occlusion'' to signal the incorrect opposition in closing of the lower teeth and upper, especially the first molar; see {{cita libro | |||
| autore = Gruenbaum T | | autore = Gruenbaum T | ||
| titolo = Famous Figures in Dentistry | | titolo = Famous Figures in Dentistry | ||
| Line 349: | Line 349: | ||
| DOI = | | DOI = | ||
| OCLC = | | OCLC = | ||
}}, 30(1):18. </ref> | }}, 30(1):18. </ref> The notion of "closure" may seem intuitive; however, the adjective "bad" requires careful consideration, as its application in the medical context is less obvious than it may appear. | ||
To | To approach an understanding of the term, this introduction poses a seemingly simple yet profoundly complex question, which in turn raises a series of related inquiries in the field of masticatory rehabilitation and, more specifically, in orthodontic disciplines: what exactly is meant by "Malocclusion"? It's interesting to note that, in 2019, a search for the term "Malocclusion" on PubMed yielded a whopping 33,309 articles,<ref>Pubmed, ''[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=%22malocclusion%22 Malocclusion]''</ref> indicating a lack of uniform terminological consensus on the subject. Among these articles, some may provide conclusions of significant relevance, as strikingly demonstrated by the work of Smaglyuk and colleagues. This particularly significant study explores the interdisciplinary approach in diagnosing malocclusions:<ref name="Smaglyuk">{{cita libro | ||
| autore = Smaglyuk LV | | autore = Smaglyuk LV | ||
| autore2 = Voronkova HV | | autore2 = Voronkova HV | ||
| Line 369: | Line 369: | ||
| OCLC = | | OCLC = | ||
}} 72(5 cz 1):918-922. | }} 72(5 cz 1):918-922. | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
{{q2|The diagnostics, treatment tactics and prevention of dento-facial anomalies and deformations should be considered in the context of the integrity of the child's unformed organism, the interdependence of the form and functions of its organs and systems}} | {{q2|The diagnostics, treatment tactics and prevention of dento-facial anomalies and deformations should be considered in the context of the integrity of the child's unformed organism, the interdependence of the form and functions of its organs and systems}} | ||