Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,894
edits
Difference between revisions of "The logic of classical language -print"
The logic of classical language -print (view source)
Revision as of 11:48, 12 January 2023
, 1 year ago→Introduction
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
}}</ref><br>Obviously, this does not preclude the validity of the clinical history built on a pseudo-formal verbal language by now well rooted in the clinical reality and which has already proved its diagnostic authority. The attempt to shift attention to a machine language and to the System provides nothing but an opportunity for the validation of Diagnostic Medical Science. | }}</ref><br>Obviously, this does not preclude the validity of the clinical history built on a pseudo-formal verbal language by now well rooted in the clinical reality and which has already proved its diagnostic authority. The attempt to shift attention to a machine language and to the System provides nothing but an opportunity for the validation of Diagnostic Medical Science. | ||
We are definitely aware that our Linux Sapiens is still perplexed about what has been anticipated and continues to wonder{{q4|... | We are definitely aware that our Linux Sapiens is still perplexed about what has been anticipated and continues to wonder. | ||
{{q4|... but... could the logic of Classical Language help us to solve poor Mary Poppins' dilemma?|a little patience, please}} | |||
We cannot provide a conventional answer because science does not progress with assertions that are not justified by scientifically validated questions and reflections; and this is actually the reason why we will try to give voice to some thoughts, perplexities and doubts expressed on some basic topics brought into discussion in some scientific articles. | We cannot provide a conventional answer because science does not progress with assertions that are not justified by scientifically validated questions and reflections; and this is actually the reason why we will try to give voice to some thoughts, perplexities and doubts expressed on some basic topics brought into discussion in some scientific articles. | ||