Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,894
edits
Difference between revisions of "The logic of classical language -print"
The logic of classical language -print (view source)
Revision as of 11:05, 12 January 2023
, 1 year ago→2nd Clinical Approach
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 550: | Line 550: | ||
}}</ref><center> | }}</ref><center> | ||
==2nd Clinical Approach== | ==2nd Clinical Approach== | ||
<gallery widths="350" heights="282" perrow="2" mode="packed"> | <gallery widths="350" heights="282" perrow="2" mode="packed"> | ||
File:Spasmo emimasticatorio.jpg|'''<!--107-->Figure 2:''' <!--108-->Patient reporting 'Orofacial Pain' in his right hemilateral face | File:Spasmo emimasticatorio.jpg|'''<!--107-->Figure 2:''' <!--108-->Patient reporting 'Orofacial Pain' in his right hemilateral face | ||
| Line 747: | Line 745: | ||
This statement is so true that the <math>P-value</math> could be infinitely extended, widened enough to obtain an <math>\alpha=0</math> that corresponds to it in an infinite significance, as long as it remains limited in its context; yet, without meaning anything from a clinical point of view in other contexts, like in the neurologist one, for instance. | This statement is so true that the <math>P-value</math> could be infinitely extended, widened enough to obtain an <math>\alpha=0</math> that corresponds to it in an infinite significance, as long as it remains limited in its context; yet, without meaning anything from a clinical point of view in other contexts, like in the neurologist one, for instance. | ||
==Final considerations== | ==Final considerations== | ||
From a perspective of observation of this kind, the Logic of Predicates can only fortify the dentist’s reasoning and, at the same time, strengthen the <u>principle of the excluded third</u>: the principle is strengthened through the compatibility of the additional assertions <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> which grant the dentist a complete coherence in the diagnosis and in confirming the sentence <math>\Im</math>: Poor Mary Poppins either has TMD, or she has not.{{q4|...<!--224-->and what if, with the advancement of research, new phenomena were discovered that would prove the neurologist right, instead of the dentist?|}} | From a perspective of observation of this kind, the Logic of Predicates can only fortify the dentist’s reasoning and, at the same time, strengthen the <u>principle of the excluded third</u>: the principle is strengthened through the compatibility of the additional assertions <math>(\delta_1,\delta_2,.....\delta_n \ )</math> which grant the dentist a complete coherence in the diagnosis and in confirming the sentence <math>\Im</math>: Poor Mary Poppins either has TMD, or she has not.{{q4|...<!--224-->and what if, with the advancement of research, new phenomena were discovered that would prove the neurologist right, instead of the dentist?|}} | ||