Difference between revisions of "Trigeminal Nervous System Segmentation"

no edit summary
Line 77: Line 77:
<translate>The stimulation of the facial motor cortex evokes a descendant burst</translate>; <translate>this burst travels along the corticobulbar tract and reaches the trigeminal and facial motorneurons with a multi-synaptic connection</translate>, <translate>whereas there is a monosynaptic and almost completely controlateral connection at the masseteric motorneurons that is similar to the corticospinal projection on motor neurons of the hand muscles</translate>. <translate>Pre-innervation has also to be acknowledged when we have to deal with the trigeminal system</translate>: <translate>even with high intensity magnetic stimulation, no motor potential can be evoked without contracting the target muscles</translate>. <translate>During the contraction, potential masseterics show shorter latency, short duration, and synchronous responses, which reach an amplitude of approximately 30% of the motor response from direct stimulation of the masseter nerve named M-wave</translate>.  
<translate>The stimulation of the facial motor cortex evokes a descendant burst</translate>; <translate>this burst travels along the corticobulbar tract and reaches the trigeminal and facial motorneurons with a multi-synaptic connection</translate>, <translate>whereas there is a monosynaptic and almost completely controlateral connection at the masseteric motorneurons that is similar to the corticospinal projection on motor neurons of the hand muscles</translate>. <translate>Pre-innervation has also to be acknowledged when we have to deal with the trigeminal system</translate>: <translate>even with high intensity magnetic stimulation, no motor potential can be evoked without contracting the target muscles</translate>. <translate>During the contraction, potential masseterics show shorter latency, short duration, and synchronous responses, which reach an amplitude of approximately 30% of the motor response from direct stimulation of the masseter nerve named M-wave</translate>.  


Motoneuronal activation follows the principle of the section: the smaller motorneurons are activated first<ref name="roth" />. Masseteric motorneurons show normal excitability when they are triggered by the stimulation from the motor cortex. Schwartz and Lund (1995) have recently studied the effect of nociceptive pressure on the mandibular movement and the EMG activity of the masseter in decerebrated rabbits. The motoneurons stimulated the corticobulbar tract through the same path, but the two entrances differed. In our experiments the short-lived high frequency discharge of action potential is of a phasic type, even if in the works of Schwartz and Lund<ref>{{cita libro  
<translate>Motoneuronal activation follows the principle of the section</translate>: <translate>the smaller motorneurons are activated first</translate><ref name="roth" />. <translate>Masseteric motorneurons show normal excitability when they are triggered by the stimulation from the motor cortex</translate>. <translate>Schwartz and Lund (1995) have recently studied the effect of nociceptive pressure on the mandibular movement and the EMG activity of the masseter in decerebrated rabbits</translate>. <translate>The motoneurons stimulated the corticobulbar tract through the same path, but the two entrances differed</translate>. <translate>In our experiments the short-lived high frequency discharge of action potential is of a phasic type, even if in the works of Schwartz and Lund</translate><ref>{{cita libro  
  | autore = Schwartz G
  | autore = Schwartz G
  | autore2 = Lund JP
  | autore2 = Lund JP
Line 91: Line 91:
  | DOI = 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00028-q  
  | DOI = 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00028-q  
  | OCLC =  
  | OCLC =  
  }}</ref>, the potentials for action are tonic. In their experiments on tonic pain, the amplitude of mandibular movements and the recruitment of the masseteric motorneurons decrease. However, we can exclude a greater excitability all along the path from the motor cortex to the lower motorneurons.
  }}</ref>, <translate>the potentials for action are tonic</translate>. <translate>In their experiments on tonic pain, the amplitude of mandibular movements and the recruitment of the masseteric motorneurons decrease. However, we can exclude a greater excitability all along the path from the motor cortex to the lower motorneurons</translate>.


===Trigeminal Peripheral Area===
===<translate>Trigeminal Peripheral Area</translate>===
[[File:Bilateral Root-MEPs.jpg|left|thumb|'''Figure 2:''' bilateral Root-MEPs]]
[[File:Bilateral Root-MEPs.jpg|left|thumb|'''<translate>Figure</translate> 2:''' <translate>bilateral Root-MEPs</translate>]]
When we need to assess the integrity of the trigeminal roots, we should evoke a motor action potential of the peripheral trigeminal motor tract in a synchronous and symmetrical way. In this situation, a <sub>m</sub> TCS is not suggested: it would rather be advisable to adopt the bilateral electric stimulation routines called <sub>bilaterally</sub>Root-MEPs technology that we fine-tuned in our neurophysiology laboratories<ref>{{cita libro  
<translate>When we need to assess the integrity of the trigeminal roots, we should evoke a motor action potential of the peripheral trigeminal motor tract in a synchronous and symmetrical way</translate>. <translate>In this situation, a <sub>m</sub> TCS is not suggested</translate>: <translate>it would rather be advisable to adopt the bilateral electric stimulation routines called <sub>bilaterally</sub>Root-MEPs technology that we fine-tuned in our neurophysiology laboratories</translate><ref>{{cita libro  
  | autore = Frisardi G
  | autore = Frisardi G
  | titolo = The use of transcranial stimulation in the fabrication of an occlusal splint
  | titolo = The use of transcranial stimulation in the fabrication of an occlusal splint
Line 110: Line 110:
  }}</ref>.  
  }}</ref>.  


In order to achieve this target, synchronicity, symmetry, and the pulse maximum power are essential. This is why electromyographers must be used for evoked potential and they must be equipped with two independent and autonomous high voltage electrostimulators. The EMG that employ tools with a single multiplexated electrostimulator to deliver two or more stimuli are not appropriated: the second impulse would lose synchronicit, because the condensers need time to recharge (Fig. 2).
<translate>In order to achieve this target, synchronicity, symmetry, and the pulse maximum power are essential</translate>. <translate>This is why electromyographers must be used for evoked potential and they must be equipped with two independent and autonomous high voltage electrostimulators</translate>. <translate>The EMGs that employ tools with a single multiplexated electrostimulator to deliver two or more stimuli are not appropriated</translate>: <translate>the second impulse would lose synchronicit, because the condensers need time to recharge</translate> (<translate>Figure</translate> 2).


[[File:FEM.jpg|left|thumb|'''Figure 3:''' Electrophysiological procedure for trigeminal evoked potentials and intracranial diffusion of the induced electric field. ]]
[[File:FEM.jpg|left|thumb|'''<translate>Figure</translate> 3:''' Electrophysiological procedure for trigeminal evoked potentials and intracranial diffusion of the induced electric field. ]]
We carry out an analysis made through a generic finite element processor (FE, SimNibs method) to study the distribution of the electric field within the intracranial brain tissue, even if only as a descriptive model (Fig. 3)<ref>{{cita libro  
We carry out an analysis made through a generic finite element processor (FE, SimNibs method) to study the distribution of the electric field within the intracranial brain tissue, even if only as a descriptive model (Fig. 3)<ref>{{cita libro  
  | autore = Windhoff M
  | autore = Windhoff M
Line 155: Line 155:
  }}</ref>.  
  }}</ref>.  


Figure 3A shows the position of the electrodes (Figure 12A); the maximum current will spread under the cathodes (red in colour) in the parietal cortex (Figure 3B); in the cranial cortex region, near the trigeminal motor root, the current density is of low magnitude (Figure 3C, black arrows). Figure 3D shows the current density that spreads in the brain tissue. It underlines the least amount of electrical current within the brain tissue necessary to saturate the trigeminal motor (relative to the amount required to evoke a response of the trigeminal motor cortex under the cathode). This is one of the reasons that urged us to choose this kind of evoked response (absolutely peripheral) rather than the cortical one (with higher threshold, lower stability, and less focus).
Figure 3A shows the position of the electrodes (<translate>Figure</translate> 12A); the maximum current will spread under the cathodes (red in colour) in the parietal cortex (Figure 3B); in the cranial cortex region, near the trigeminal motor root, the current density is of low magnitude (<translate>Figure</translate> 3C, black arrows). Figure 3D shows the current density that spreads in the brain tissue. It underlines the least amount of electrical current within the brain tissue necessary to saturate the trigeminal motor (relative to the amount required to evoke a response of the trigeminal motor cortex under the cathode). This is one of the reasons that urged us to choose this kind of evoked response (absolutely peripheral) rather than the cortical one (with higher threshold, lower stability, and less focus).


With this approach, we came concluded that, given the emergence of the trigeminal root in oval foramen and the distance from the parietal bone and parietal cortical area, the cathode positioning should be more caudal than the regulation (11–13 cm on the acoustic-meacoustic line): immediately above the upper edge of the ear. The position of the cathode, therefore, will be approximately more than the starndard 13–15 cm and will be delimited by the upper margin of the ear.
With this approach, we came concluded that, given the emergence of the trigeminal root in oval foramen and the distance from the parietal bone and parietal cortical area, the cathode positioning should be more caudal than the regulation (11–13 cm on the acoustic-meacoustic line): immediately above the upper edge of the ear. The position of the cathode, therefore, will be approximately more than the starndard 13–15 cm and will be delimited by the upper margin of the ear.
Line 176: Line 176:
The saturation of the electrophysiological signal evoked by the trigeminal root is the first absolute and mandatory step that needs to be performed, even before clinical interpretation. The saturation of the evoked potentials from the trigeminal root showed no change in amplitude. In fact, when the electrostimulator reaches 80 mA pulses, 90 mA, and 100 mA, the P-P amplitude stabilizes at 4.6 mV (Fig. 4). The amplitude value of 4.6 mV (of course, the amplitude can be chosen to the integral area or vice versa, depending on the purpose of the study) is to be considered the ‘''Maximum Absolute value of Neural Evoked Energy''’ from the trigeminal motor system. It is called '''‘<sub>m</sub>ANEE’'''.
The saturation of the electrophysiological signal evoked by the trigeminal root is the first absolute and mandatory step that needs to be performed, even before clinical interpretation. The saturation of the evoked potentials from the trigeminal root showed no change in amplitude. In fact, when the electrostimulator reaches 80 mA pulses, 90 mA, and 100 mA, the P-P amplitude stabilizes at 4.6 mV (Fig. 4). The amplitude value of 4.6 mV (of course, the amplitude can be chosen to the integral area or vice versa, depending on the purpose of the study) is to be considered the ‘''Maximum Absolute value of Neural Evoked Energy''’ from the trigeminal motor system. It is called '''‘<sub>m</sub>ANEE’'''.
   
   
[[File:Test trigeminali.jpg|left|thumb|'''Figure 5:''' Tests mainly used in trigeminal neurophysiopathology]]
[[File:Test trigeminali.jpg|left|thumb|'''<translate>Figure</translate> 5:''' Tests mainly used in trigeminal neurophysiopathology]]


===Trigeminal Brainstem Area===
===Trigeminal Brainstem Area===
The trigeminal brainstem area is the most complex area to study and interpret because of the complexity of its multi-synaptic connections. The following electro-physiological tests are objectively sufficient to understand the cryptic language of the SCNS. These will be treated in this section, but they will also be resumed in other editions. The following trigeminal reflexes will be considered: the ''jaw jerk'', the ''mechanical and electrical silent period'', the ''recovery cycle of the masseteric inhibitory reflex'' and the ''laser silent period'', as well as the ''masseteric laser-evoked potentials'' (Fig. 5).
The trigeminal brainstem area is the most complex area to study and interpret because of the complexity of its multi-synaptic connections. The following electro-physiological tests are objectively sufficient to understand the cryptic language of the SCNS. These will be treated in this section, but they will also be resumed in other editions. The following trigeminal reflexes will be considered: the ''jaw jerk'', the ''mechanical and electrical silent period'', the ''recovery cycle of the masseteric inhibitory reflex'' and the ''laser silent period'', as well as the ''masseteric laser-evoked potentials'' (<translate>Figure</translate> 5).


====Jaw jerk Reflex====
====Jaw jerk Reflex====
[[File:Riflesso mandibolare.jpg|left|thumb|'''Figure 6:''' Mandibular reflex performed with Nihon Kohden instrumentation]]
[[File:Riflesso mandibolare.jpg|left|thumb|'''<translate>Figure</translate> 6:''' Mandibular reflex performed with Nihon Kohden instrumentation]]
The piezoelectric trigger is used for the mandibular reflex, though it does not provide controlled reproducibility and quantification of the stimulation intensity; simultaneous recordings of the two sides are considered an essential method for the accurate and acceptable assessment of the asymmetry of the side. Asymmetry in the latency is very small: it ranges from 0 to 0.8 ms with an average of 0.13 ms (SD 0.17) in 131 normal subjects<ref>{{cita libro  
The piezoelectric trigger is used for the mandibular reflex, though it does not provide controlled reproducibility and quantification of the stimulation intensity; simultaneous recordings of the two sides are considered an essential method for the accurate and acceptable assessment of the asymmetry of the side. Asymmetry in the latency is very small: it ranges from 0 to 0.8 ms with an average of 0.13 ms (SD 0.17) in 131 normal subjects<ref>{{cita libro  
  | autore = Kimura J
  | autore = Kimura J
Line 204: Line 204:
  | DOI = 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90131-7  
  | DOI = 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90131-7  
  | OCLC =  
  | OCLC =  
  }}</ref>. Although in trigeminal neuropathy or multiple sclerosis the jaw jerk reflex may be retarded by several milliseconds, asymmetries of latency of only 0.8 ms were considered to be a higher limit of normality in neurological studies (Fig.6).
  }}</ref>. Although in trigeminal neuropathy or multiple sclerosis the jaw jerk reflex may be retarded by several milliseconds, asymmetries of latency of only 0.8 ms were considered to be a higher limit of normality in neurological studies (<translate>Figure</translate> 6).


In previous studies about the jaw jerk in patients with cranial-mandibular disorders (TMDs), patients with ''unilateral'' disorders were selected to identify an affection side in which there was a latency delay and a lower amplitude on the side of the mandibular deviation and pain. Even if the maximum mandibular closure force in TMDs can be reduced to half as much as control groups<ref>{{cita libro  
In previous studies about the jaw jerk in patients with cranial-mandibular disorders (TMDs), patients with ''unilateral'' disorders were selected to identify an affection side in which there was a latency delay and a lower amplitude on the side of the mandibular deviation and pain. Even if the maximum mandibular closure force in TMDs can be reduced to half as much as control groups<ref>{{cita libro  
Line 257: Line 257:
  }}</ref>.  
  }}</ref>.  


The afferents from group II in the division of the maxillary and mandibular trigeminal nerve apply a powerful inhibition of the motoneurons of the mastication muscles through synaptic and polysynaptic reflexes. A remarkable feature of the mandibular reflexes, however, is their bilateral symmetry. In some patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) the latency is prolonged, whereas it lacks in others: this reflex can sometimes be essential for diagnosing the lesions of the brainstem in MS. It might alsi be more effective for therapy (Fig. 6).
The afferents from group II in the division of the maxillary and mandibular trigeminal nerve apply a powerful inhibition of the motoneurons of the mastication muscles through synaptic and polysynaptic reflexes. A remarkable feature of the mandibular reflexes, however, is their bilateral symmetry. In some patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) the latency is prolonged, whereas it lacks in others: this reflex can sometimes be essential for diagnosing the lesions of the brainstem in MS. It might alsi be more effective for therapy (<translate>Figure</translate> 6).


====Masseteric Mechanical Silent Period====
====Masseteric Mechanical Silent Period====
[[File:PSM_-_Masseter_mechanical_Silent_Period.jpg|left|thumb|'''Figure 7:''' Representation of a typical masseteric inhibitory reflex (MSP) ]]
[[File:PSM_-_Masseter_mechanical_Silent_Period.jpg|left|thumb|'''<translate>Figure</translate> 7:''' Representation of a typical masseteric inhibitory reflex (MSP) ]]
The jaw jerk is a short-latency excitatory reflection that can be evoked by a stretch of the mandibular elevators through a percussion produced by a triggered neurological hammer. The excitation on motoneurons <code>α</code> from the neuromuscular spindles is the only generally accepted explanation. When this type of mechanical stimulus is applied during voluntary activation EMG, (by pressing the teeth,as an example) the jaw overlaps with the Interference  EMG activity, and is followed by a period of absence or depression of the electromyographic activity, the so-called '''Masseteric Silent Period''' (MSP)<ref>{{cita libro  
The jaw jerk is a short-latency excitatory reflection that can be evoked by a stretch of the mandibular elevators through a percussion produced by a triggered neurological hammer. The excitation on motoneurons <code>α</code> from the neuromuscular spindles is the only generally accepted explanation. When this type of mechanical stimulus is applied during voluntary activation EMG, (by pressing the teeth,as an example) the jaw overlaps with the Interference  EMG activity, and is followed by a period of absence or depression of the electromyographic activity, the so-called '''Masseteric Silent Period''' (MSP)<ref>{{cita libro  
  | autore = Goldberg LJ
  | autore = Goldberg LJ
Line 274: Line 274:
  | DOI = 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90330-1  
  | DOI = 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90330-1  
  | OCLC =  
  | OCLC =  
  }}</ref> (Fig.7).  
  }}</ref> (<translate>Figure</translate> 7).  


The MSP has sparked particular interest as it has been shown that the duration of the silent period is higher in patients with TMDs<ref>{{cita libro  
The MSP has sparked particular interest as it has been shown that the duration of the silent period is higher in patients with TMDs<ref>{{cita libro  
Line 328: Line 328:


====Recovery Cycle of Masseteric Inhibitory Reflex====
====Recovery Cycle of Masseteric Inhibitory Reflex====
[[File:CR_MIR_masseter_inhibitory_recovery_cycle_reflex.jpg|left|thumb|'''Figure 8:''' Representation of the masseteric inhibitory reflex recovery cycle. Note the pair of electrical stimuli (S1 and S2) and the corresponding silent periods (ES1 and ES2)]]
[[File:CR_MIR_masseter_inhibitory_recovery_cycle_reflex.jpg|left|thumb|'''<translate>Figure</translate> 8:''' Representation of the masseteric inhibitory reflex recovery cycle. Note the pair of electrical stimuli (S1 and S2) and the corresponding silent periods (ES1 and ES2)]]
Headache is oftes associated with a ‘sensitization’ of the nociceptive trigeminal system with the involvement of anti-nocicective mesenchephalic structures such as periaqueductal substance, locus coeruleus, and the nuclei of the raphe, which have a modulator effect on trigeminal sensitive nuclei<ref>{{cita libro  
Headache is oftes associated with a ‘sensitization’ of the nociceptive trigeminal system with the involvement of anti-nocicective mesenchephalic structures such as periaqueductal substance, locus coeruleus, and the nuclei of the raphe, which have a modulator effect on trigeminal sensitive nuclei<ref>{{cita libro  
  | autore = Holle D  
  | autore = Holle D  
Line 488: Line 488:
  }}</ref>. It seems that the ‘sensitization’ of the trigeminal nociception system, the facilitation effect on the mandibular reflesxs, and the hyper-excitability of CNS are neurophysiopathogenetic phenomena that are related to pain in the craniofacial district. At the same time, the recovery cycle of the torpedo period shows the level of neuronal excitability of the trigeminal system, and it could be a valid method of testing the excitability of the nervous system.  
  }}</ref>. It seems that the ‘sensitization’ of the trigeminal nociception system, the facilitation effect on the mandibular reflesxs, and the hyper-excitability of CNS are neurophysiopathogenetic phenomena that are related to pain in the craniofacial district. At the same time, the recovery cycle of the torpedo period shows the level of neuronal excitability of the trigeminal system, and it could be a valid method of testing the excitability of the nervous system.  


The recovery cycle of the masseteric reflection reflex (<sub>rc</sub> MIR: recovery cycle Masseteric Inhibitory Reflex) has been studied by generating pairs of stimuli with identical characteristics provided percutaneously by an electrical stimulator positioned on the patient’s face in the emergency area of the mental nerves (Fig. 8).
The recovery cycle of the masseteric reflection reflex (<sub>rc</sub> MIR: recovery cycle Masseteric Inhibitory Reflex) has been studied by generating pairs of stimuli with identical characteristics provided percutaneously by an electrical stimulator positioned on the patient’s face in the emergency area of the mental nerves (<translate>Figure</translate> 8).


Stimulation was carried out with a square-wave electrical stimulation that was 2.5 times the inhibitory reflection threshold, which was able to evoke a distinct <sub>rc</sub> MIR, composed of the two silent periods called ‘exteroceptive suppression’ to distinguish them from separate mechanical Silent Periods (SPs); these can be recognized in a first silent period called ES <sub>1</sub> (Exteroceptive Suppression <sub>1</sub>) and a second silent period named ES <sub>2</sub> (Exteroceptive Suppression <sub>2</sub>) interspersed by the resumption of the activity EMG (Interposed IA Activity). The first stimulus (S1) is considered to be conditioning and the second (S2) a stimulation test. The interstimulus range to verify the presence of a neural hyperexcitability between S1 and S2 has been set at 150 ms. In our studies, healthy subjects were instructed to tighten their teeth to produce the maximum EMG activity and maintain it for at least 3 seconds with the help of visual and sound feedback. After 60 seconds of rest, the subject repeated the contraction. The EMG signal was recorded in direct  mode and mediated mode. The disposition of the recorder electrodes must be the same as for the registration of the <sub>b</sub> Root, jaw jerk, and SP. The parameters of the preamplifier will have to be set in 50 ms per division, 100 mV per division, and the filter bandwidth of 50 Hz–1 kHz.
Stimulation was carried out with a square-wave electrical stimulation that was 2.5 times the inhibitory reflection threshold, which was able to evoke a distinct <sub>rc</sub> MIR, composed of the two silent periods called ‘exteroceptive suppression’ to distinguish them from separate mechanical Silent Periods (SPs); these can be recognized in a first silent period called ES <sub>1</sub> (Exteroceptive Suppression <sub>1</sub>) and a second silent period named ES <sub>2</sub> (Exteroceptive Suppression <sub>2</sub>) interspersed by the resumption of the activity EMG (Interposed IA Activity). The first stimulus (S1) is considered to be conditioning and the second (S2) a stimulation test. The interstimulus range to verify the presence of a neural hyperexcitability between S1 and S2 has been set at 150 ms. In our studies, healthy subjects were instructed to tighten their teeth to produce the maximum EMG activity and maintain it for at least 3 seconds with the help of visual and sound feedback. After 60 seconds of rest, the subject repeated the contraction. The EMG signal was recorded in direct  mode and mediated mode. The disposition of the recorder electrodes must be the same as for the registration of the <sub>b</sub> Root, jaw jerk, and SP. The parameters of the preamplifier will have to be set in 50 ms per division, 100 mV per division, and the filter bandwidth of 50 Hz–1 kHz.
[[File:Laser test.jpg|thumb|'''Figure 9:''' Preparation of the subject to laser stimulation to evoke nociceptive evoked potentials and masseteric inhibitory reflexes.]]
[[File:Laser test.jpg|thumb|'''<translate>Figure</translate> 9:''' Preparation of the subject to laser stimulation to evoke nociceptive evoked potentials and masseteric inhibitory reflexes.]]


====Laser Evoked Potentials and Masseteric Laser Silent Period====
====Laser Evoked Potentials and Masseteric Laser Silent Period====


To evoke motor responses from the masticatory muscles or potential laser evenings, we employ a laser stimulator CO<sub>2</sub> (Neurolas, Florence, Italy) capable of generating a radiant caloria (10.6 mm; intensity 1.5–15 W; duration of 10–15 ms; diameter of the 2.5 mm spot) in the area of the skin in upper and lower upper and lower region (trigeminal terrain V2 and V3). The subjects must sit comfortably in the dental chair and wear protective goggles (Fig. 9). To avoid the habit to the nociceptive stimuli and the overheating of the skin, the irradiated points have been shifted after each stimulation.   
To evoke motor responses from the masticatory muscles or potential laser evenings, we employ a laser stimulator CO<sub>2</sub> (Neurolas, Florence, Italy) capable of generating a radiant caloria (10.6 mm; intensity 1.5–15 W; duration of 10–15 ms; diameter of the 2.5 mm spot) in the area of the skin in upper and lower upper and lower region (trigeminal terrain V2 and V3). The subjects must sit comfortably in the dental chair and wear protective goggles (<translate>Figure</translate> 9). To avoid the habit to the nociceptive stimuli and the overheating of the skin, the irradiated points have been shifted after each stimulation.   


[[File:Laser_Evoked_Potentials_-_Blink_reflex_-_Masseter_Silent_Period.jpg|left|thumb|'''Figure 9:'''  Laser stimulation that evoke a Blink reflex (BR), a Masseter Inhibitor Reflex (MIR) and Evoked Potentials Laser (LEPs)]]The perception threshold has been determined by the limits method in two sets of intensity by increasing or decreasing the trigger stimulation. The intensity of the laser beam is fixed at 1.5 the perceptual threshold. With regard to LEP (LEP: Laser Evoked Potentials), signals are recorded through the top-disk electrodes (Cz) with two references for each side on the ear lobes (A1, A2). Two blocks of eight to 12 tests each are mediated off-line. Signs are amplified, filtered (0.5–50 Hz), and stored by means of an analyser for biopotential (Premiere, Medelec, UK). For each block, we have measured the latency of the N and P components and the peak-to-peak width of the potential evoked.<ref>Romaniello, A., et al., ''[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Assessment+of+nociceptive+trigeminal+pathways+by+laser-evoked+potentials+and+laser+silent+periods+in+patients+with+painful+temporomandibular+disorders.+Pain%2C+2003 Assessment of nociceptive trigeminal pathways by laser-evoked potentials and laser silent periods in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders.]'' Pain, 2003. 103(1-2): p. 31-9. </ref> For LSPs, the same parameters were used as described above, but the recording is performed on masseter muscles. The area was subtracted from the 100-ms curve prior to adjusted and mediated laser stimulus (pre-analysis). The duration of the registered EMG activity is 400 ms, of which 100 ms corresponds to pre-stimulus and 300 ms in the post-stimulus period. The EMG signals are amplified, filtered (20 Hz–1 kHz), and sampled at 4 kHz. Subjects are asked to tighten their teeth with the maximum muscular strength to determine the EMG activity corresponding to the Maximum Volunteer Contraction (MVC: Maximum Voluntary Contraction) of masseter muscles and at different levels (15–25%), (35–45%), (55-65%), and (75–85%) of MVC. Subjects receive visual feedback with markers on the computer screen, which clearly indicates when the default level is reached. As one can see in Figure 19, the results of the following work are schematized in accordance with the type of test performed. With a laser stimulation in the skin region corresponding to the emergence of the supraorbital nerve (V1), we can have a Blink Reflex as a reflected response (BR) and notice the perfect symmetry of the responses on sides R1 and R2. Stimulation in the perioral region will result in a reflex response from the masseterini muscles called Laser Silent Period (LSP: Laser Silent Period). We might note that, in this test, a slight asymmetry of the track—mainly caused by the different degree of motoneural recruitment in the maximum intercuspidation. The registration on the scalp determines the potential laser summers of the trigeminal somatosensory area (LEPs) and measure the negative and positive spikes (N and P). Here, too, we witness a high level of symmetry.  
[[File:Laser_Evoked_Potentials_-_Blink_reflex_-_Masseter_Silent_Period.jpg|left|thumb|'''<translate>Figure</translate> 9:'''  Laser stimulation that evoke a Blink reflex (BR), a Masseter Inhibitor Reflex (MIR) and Evoked Potentials Laser (LEPs)]]The perception threshold has been determined by the limits method in two sets of intensity by increasing or decreasing the trigger stimulation. The intensity of the laser beam is fixed at 1.5 the perceptual threshold. With regard to LEP (LEP: Laser Evoked Potentials), signals are recorded through the top-disk electrodes (Cz) with two references for each side on the ear lobes (A1, A2). Two blocks of eight to 12 tests each are mediated off-line. Signs are amplified, filtered (0.5–50 Hz), and stored by means of an analyser for biopotential (Premiere, Medelec, UK). For each block, we have measured the latency of the N and P components and the peak-to-peak width of the potential evoked.<ref>Romaniello, A., et al., ''[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Assessment+of+nociceptive+trigeminal+pathways+by+laser-evoked+potentials+and+laser+silent+periods+in+patients+with+painful+temporomandibular+disorders.+Pain%2C+2003 Assessment of nociceptive trigeminal pathways by laser-evoked potentials and laser silent periods in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders.]'' Pain, 2003. 103(1-2): p. 31-9. </ref> For LSPs, the same parameters were used as described above, but the recording is performed on masseter muscles. The area was subtracted from the 100-ms curve prior to adjusted and mediated laser stimulus (pre-analysis). The duration of the registered EMG activity is 400 ms, of which 100 ms corresponds to pre-stimulus and 300 ms in the post-stimulus period. The EMG signals are amplified, filtered (20 Hz–1 kHz), and sampled at 4 kHz. Subjects are asked to tighten their teeth with the maximum muscular strength to determine the EMG activity corresponding to the Maximum Volunteer Contraction (MVC: Maximum Voluntary Contraction) of masseter muscles and at different levels (15–25%), (35–45%), (55-65%), and (75–85%) of MVC. Subjects receive visual feedback with markers on the computer screen, which clearly indicates when the default level is reached. As one can see in Figure 19, the results of the following work are schematized in accordance with the type of test performed. With a laser stimulation in the skin region corresponding to the emergence of the supraorbital nerve (V1), we can have a Blink Reflex as a reflected response (BR) and notice the perfect symmetry of the responses on sides R1 and R2. Stimulation in the perioral region will result in a reflex response from the masseterini muscles called Laser Silent Period (LSP: Laser Silent Period). We might note that, in this test, a slight asymmetry of the track—mainly caused by the different degree of motoneural recruitment in the maximum intercuspidation. The registration on the scalp determines the potential laser summers of the trigeminal somatosensory area (LEPs) and measure the negative and positive spikes (N and P). Here, too, we witness a high level of symmetry.  


The Exposed Laser procedure is very interesting because—as shown in Figure 19—there is evidence of a high symmetry of the blue component of the Blink reflex (R2 right and left) that corresponds to the motor nerve activity of the facial nerve; a relative somatosensory symmetry might be detected(N2 and P2, while a clear asymmetry of the MCV masseterin (MIR) is denoted in the width of the motor unit by both stimulus and post-inhibition. This introduces an important concept of the neural symmetry that might reveal an extraordinarily fascinating world of neurophysiopathological notions in the field of mastication.
The Exposed Laser procedure is very interesting because—as shown in Figure 19—there is evidence of a high symmetry of the blue component of the Blink reflex (R2 right and left) that corresponds to the motor nerve activity of the facial nerve; a relative somatosensory symmetry might be detected(N2 and P2, while a clear asymmetry of the MCV masseterin (MIR) is denoted in the width of the motor unit by both stimulus and post-inhibition. This introduces an important concept of the neural symmetry that might reveal an extraordinarily fascinating world of neurophysiopathological notions in the field of mastication.
Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,894

edits