|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{main menu}} | | {{main menu}} |
|
| |
| [[File:Meningioma 3 by Gianni Frisardi.jpeg|link=link=Special:FilePath/Meningioma_3_by_Gianni_Frisardi.jpg|alt=|left|frameless]]
| |
| This analysis explores the complex relationships between dental malocclusion, postural disorders, and trigeminal neurophysiopathology through the case of 'Balancer,' a patient with a decade-long struggle with a skull base meningioma. This case highlights the challenges and misdiagnoses that can arise when traditional dental perspectives overlook deeper neurophysiological issues, advocating for a more nuanced approach to diagnosis and treatment. The chapter begins by addressing the limitations of axiomatic assumptions in medical diagnoses, particularly when dealing with the interplay between dental health and neurological conditions. 'Balancer's' symptoms were initially interpreted through a dental lens but later revealed significant neurological pathology.
| |
|
| |
| The narrative explores how 'Balancer's' meningioma affected both sensory and motor fibers of the trigeminal nerve, leading to severe symptoms misinterpreted as dental issues. This section underscores the importance of integrating neurophysiological data into dental diagnoses, especially for atypical or severe symptoms.
| |
|
| |
| The summary evaluates the diagnostic process, emphasizing the role of electrophysiological tests such as bRoot-MEPs and jaw jerk reflex assessments. These tests provided a clearer picture of the nerve damage than traditional dental evaluations and highlighted the need for medical imaging to confirm the meningioma's presence and impact.
| |
|
| |
| MRI results confirmed the meningioma's severe implications, showing brainstem displacement and raising questions about the tumor's early development stages. The section considers whether earlier detection through targeted electrophysiological testing could have changed the treatment course.
| |
|
| |
| 'Balancer's' case illustrates how symptoms like 'chewing difficulty' can be misleading. The narrative advocates for an integrated diagnostic approach that combines dental and neurological expertise to avoid oversimplified conclusions and inadequate treatments.
| |
|
| |
| The use of a Cognitive Neural Network (CNN) in diagnosing 'Balancer's' condition is discussed, demonstrating how advanced data analysis can differentiate between dental malocclusions and serious neurological conditions. This section outlines the CNN's steps to refine the diagnosis and understand the underlying causes of symptoms.
| |
|
| |
| The chapter concludes by discussing the broader clinical implications for dentistry and neurology. It calls for greater awareness of neurological conditions manifesting as dental symptoms and recommends interdisciplinary approaches in medical training and practice to prevent diagnostic errors.
| |
|
| |
|
| {{ArtBy| | | {{ArtBy| |