Difference between revisions of "Conclusion of the ‘Normal Science’ section"

Conclusion of the ‘Normal Science’ section (view source)

400 bytes added , 7 months ago

no edit summary

Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, member, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator

11,073

edits

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 The discussion concludes by emphasizing the importance of adopting a diagnostic approach that integrates the best practices and methodologies available. It is suggested that the adoption of quantum models in addition to the traditional Bayes model could significantly improve the accuracy of medical diagnoses, providing clinicians with more robust tools to interpret diagnostic test results and manage diseases more effectively.
+<blockquote>
+== Keywords ==
+Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD), Bayes' Theorem in medical diagnosis, Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, Quantum models in medicine, Diagnostic test accuracy for TMD, Non-commutative variables in diagnostics, Multidisciplinary approach to medical diagnosis, Chronic orofacial pain diagnosis, Clinical trials for TMD</blockquote>
 {{ArtBy|||autore=Gianni Frisardi|autore2=Giorgio Cruccu|autore3=Luca Fontana|autore4=Cesare Iani|autore5=Marco Barbieri|autore6=Diego Centronze|autore7=Manuel Luci|autore8=Flavio Frisardi|autore9=}}