Difference between revisions of "The logic of the classical language"

The logic of the classical language (view source)

Revision as of 15:29, 10 March 2024

1,130 bytes added , 8 months ago

no edit summary

Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator

10,782

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{main menu}}
+== Abstract ==
+[[File:Spasmo emimasticatorio assiografia.jpg|left|200px]]The chapter begins by examining the transition from traditional clinical language to encrypted machine language in the context of medicine. It emphasizes the importance of time as an information carrier and introduces the idea of using machine language to better understand medical symptoms.
-[[File:Spasmo emimasticatorio assiografia.jpg|left|200px]]
+The validity of traditional clinical language rooted in clinical reality and proven authoritative in diagnosis is acknowledged. However, the opportunity to validate diagnostic medical science through a machine language and system approach is highlighted.
-'''Classical logic''' will be discussed in this chapter. In the first part, mathematical formalism and the rules that compose it will be illustrated. In the second part, a clinical example will be given to evaluate its effectiveness in determining a diagnosis.<br>In conclusion, it is evident that a classical logic of language, which has an extremely dichotomous approach (either something is white, or it is black), cannot describe the many shades that real clinical situations have.<br>As we shall soon see, this paper will show that classical logic lacks the necessary precision, forcing us to enhance it with other types of logic languages. {{ArtBy|
+The field of craniofacial biology is then examined, citing a study by Townsend and Brook that raises fundamental questions in craniofacial research. The importance of an interdisciplinary approach and technological advancements in the field, including gene sequencing and advanced diagnostic imaging, is discussed.
+The role of epigenetics and phenomics in determining variations in craniofacial form and function is highlighted, with reference to various studies and authors delving into this subject.
+Next, a clinical case involving a patient with orofacial pain is addressed, examining how classical logic language is applied to formulate a diagnosis and treatment using predicates and logical inferences.
+Instrumental and clinical data related to the case are analyzed, highlighting the use of logical rules to confirm or refute diagnostic hypotheses.
+Finally, the need for a more flexible logical language adaptable to the nuances of clinical practice is raised, emphasizing the importance of remaining open to the evolution of research and medical knowledge. The possibility that new discoveries may challenge current beliefs and require adaptation of the logical language used in medicine is discussed.
+{{ArtBy|
 | autore = Gianni Frisardi
 | autore2 = Riccardo Azzali