Difference between revisions of "The logic of the classical language"

no edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
| autore3 = Flavio Frisardi
| autore3 = Flavio Frisardi
}}
}}
{{Bookind2}}
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
We parted ways in the previous chapter on the ‘[[The logic of medical language|Logic of Medical Language]]’ in an attempt to shift the attention from clinical symptom or sign to encrypted machine language for which, the arguments of Donald E Stanley, Daniel G Campos and Pat Croskerry are welcome but connected to time <math>t_n</math> as an information carrier (anticipation of the symptom) and to the message as a machine language and not as a non-verbal language).<ref>{{Cite book  
We parted ways in the previous chapter on the ‘[[The logic of medical language|Logic of Medical Language]]’ in an attempt to shift the attention from clinical symptom or sign to encrypted machine language for which, the arguments of Donald E Stanley, Daniel G Campos and Pat Croskerry are welcome but connected to time <math>t_n</math> as an information carrier (anticipation of the symptom) and to the message as a machine language and not as a non-verbal language).<ref>{{Cite book  
Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, founder, Interface administrators, oversight, Suppressors, Administrators, translator
10,785

edits