Difference between revisions of "1° Caso clínico: Espasmo hemimasticatorio"

==== Demarcator of coherence <math>\tau</math>====

The <math>\tau</math> is a representative clinical specific weight, complex to research and fine-tune because it varies from discipline to discipline and for pathologies, essential in order not to make logical assertions collide <math>\Im_o</math> and <math>\Im_n</math> in the diagnostic procedures and essential to initialize the decryption of the logic communication code. Basically it allows you to confirm the consistency of a union <math>\Im\cup\{\delta_1,\delta_2.....\delta_n\}</math> with respect to another <math>\Im\cup\{\gamma_1,\gamma_2.....\gamma_n\}</math> and vice versa, giving greater weight to the severity of the statements and the report in the appropriate context.   

Sometimes the physician is faced with a series of positive reports to which to give due weight, he must consider the positivity of a report that highlights, for example, an osteoarticular remodeling of the TMJ cannot have the same weight as a positivity of a report confirming a latency delay of a trigeminal reflex.  

The weight of demarcation <math>\tau</math>, therefore, gives more significance to the most serious assertions in the clinical context from which they derive and therefore beyond the positivity of the <math>\delta_n=1</math> or <math>\gamma_n=1</math> assertions which in any case are always verified and respected, these must be multiplied by a <math>\tau=[0|1]</math> where <math>\tau=0</math> indicates 'Low severity' while <math>\tau=1</math> 'High severity'.   

In the neurological context, <math>\tau</math> concerns the presence of delays and/or latency absence of the jaw jerk, duration and/or absence of the masseterine silent period as well as other parameters that for the moment it is not necessary to describe. A delay greater than the normative value or an absence of the aforementioned tests is considered as a serious and absolute specific weight corresponding to a dominant valence with respect to the other clinical context.  

To recap we therefore have:

<math>{\bar\delta_n}=</math> average of the value of clinical statements in the dental context and therefore <math>{\bar\delta_n}=1</math>

<math>{\bar\gamma_n}=</math> average of the value of clinical statements in the neurological context and therefore<math>{\bar\gamma_n}=1</math>

<math>\tau_o=0</math> low severity performance of the dental context<math>\tau_n=1</math>reporting of high severity of the neurological context

{{Q2|This formal logic syntax procedure allowed us to eliminate the interference of low clinical severity assertions and quickly define a neurological rather than dental diagnostic path through the definition of <math>\Im_d= \Im_n

Once we have washed away the myriad of positively reported normative data, which generate conflicts between contexts, thanks to the coherence marker <math>\tau</math> we have a much clearer and more linear picture on which to deepen the analysis of the functionality of the Central Nervous System. Consequently we can concentrate on intercepting the tests necessary to decrypt the machine language code that the SNC sends out converted into verbal language.