Difference between revisions of "The logic of probabilistic language"

The logic of probabilistic language (view source)

Revision as of 01:47, 17 October 2022

40 bytes removed , 2 years ago

no edit summary

Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors

17,886

edits

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[File:Spasmo_emimasticatorio_JJ.jpg|alt=|left|250px]]
-<!--1-->In this chapter, we will discuss the logic of language coupled with mathematical probability. <!--2-->We have seen that [[The logic of classical language|classical logic]] alone is insufficient to determine accurate diagnoses; <!--3-->hence, a conceptual and formal overview is given on why probability can be very useful. <!--4-->Providing illustrations of instances of clinical cases, we will see how the logic of probabilistic language is able to provide us a differential diagnosis in a ‘good enough’ way.
+In this chapter, we will discuss the logic of language coupled with mathematical probability. We have seen that [[The logic of classical language|classical logic]] alone is insufficient to determine accurate diagnoses; hence, a conceptual and formal overview is given on why probability can be very useful. Providing illustrations of instances of clinical cases, we will see how the logic of probabilistic language is able to provide us a differential diagnosis in a ‘good enough’ way.
-<!--5-->The conclusion is that it is possible to demonstrate that, even with the addition of probabilistic reasoning alone, it is not possible to determine exact diagnoses, so other enrichments are being sought for our language.
+The conclusion is that it is possible to demonstrate that, even with the addition of probabilistic reasoning alone, it is not possible to determine exact diagnoses, so other enrichments are being sought for our language.
 {{ArtBy|