Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,894
edits
Difference between revisions of "Store:LPLen05"
→Third Clinical Approach
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
In this way it has been shown that, inevitably, | In this way it has been shown that, inevitably, | ||
{{q2|<!--174-->the logic of medical language is more or less based on data that derive from a specific world or context or rather, a specialistic context in which the perimeter that delimits this knowledge does not allow us to project ourselves into parallel contexts}} | {{q2|<!--174-->the logic of medical language is more or less based on data that derive from a specific world or context or rather, a specialistic context in which the perimeter that delimits this knowledge does not allow us to project ourselves into parallel contexts}} | ||
By exploring this perimeter line of the specialist context, we will create an area close to it which we will call the 'fuzzy zone' or 'fuzzy logic' which we will discuss in the next chapter. | By exploring this perimeter line of the specialist context, we will create an area close to it which we will call the 'fuzzy zone' or 'fuzzy logic' which we will discuss in the next chapter. | ||
| Line 104: | Line 103: | ||
[[Category:Articles about logic of language]] | [[Category:Articles about logic of language]] | ||
[[File:Spasmo_emimasticatorio_JJ.jpg|alt=|left|250px]] | |||
[[File:Spasmo_emimasticatorio_JJ.jpg|alt=|left| | |||
In this chapter, we will discuss the logic of language coupled with mathematical probability. <!--2-->We have seen that [[The logic of classical language|classical logic]] alone is insufficient to determine accurate diagnoses; <!--3-->hence, a conceptual and formal overview is given on why probability can be very useful. <!--4-->Providing illustrations of instances of clinical cases, we will see how the logic of probabilistic language is able to provide us a differential diagnosis in a ‘good enough’ way. | |||
The conclusion is that it is possible to demonstrate that, even with the addition of probabilistic reasoning alone, it is not possible to determine exact diagnoses, so other enrichments are being sought for our language. | |||
{{ArtBy| | {{ArtBy| | ||