Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,889
edits
Difference between revisions of "Bilateral Trigeminal neuromotor organic symmetry"
Bilateral Trigeminal neuromotor organic symmetry (view source)
Revision as of 15:37, 8 March 2022
, 2 years ago→Statistical analysis
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
The statistical analysis follows a conventional process aimed at the quantification of the “ <math>_mANEE</math> ”, which essentially indicates the maximum absolute value delivered by the motor trigeminal nervous system and an unconventional process focused mainly on the symmetry analysis between the sides of the bR-MEPs. | The statistical analysis follows a conventional process aimed at the quantification of the “ <math>_mANEE</math> ”, which essentially indicates the maximum absolute value delivered by the motor trigeminal nervous system and an unconventional process focused mainly on the symmetry analysis between the sides of the bR-MEPs. | ||
[[File:Symmetry 1.jpg|sinistra|thumb|377px|'''Table 1:''' shows the raw EMG values for the onset latency, amplitude and integral area of the bR-MEPs. (*) Indicates EMGvalues of the subject considered as example in results section.]] | [[File:Symmetry 1.jpg|sinistra|thumb|377px|'''Table 1:''' shows the raw EMG values for the onset latency, amplitude and integral area of the bR-MEPs. (*) Indicates EMGvalues of the subject considered as example in results section.]] | ||
We performed descriptive statistic on the raw EMG values for the computation of mean, standard deviations, analysis of sample’s distribution. The comparison between the two sides for the latencies, amplitudes and EMG integral areas was performed by Kruskal-Wallis test | We performed descriptive statistic on the raw EMG values for the computation of mean, standard deviations, analysis of sample’s distribution. The comparison between the two sides for the latencies, amplitudes and EMG integral areas was performed by Kruskal-Wallis test. | ||
< | Significance was set at a <math>p-value <0.05</math>''p''. | ||
===Artifical neural network model=== | ===Artifical neural network model=== | ||