Editor, Editors, USER, admin, Bureaucrats, Check users, dev, editor, Interface administrators, lookupuser, oversight, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators, translator, Widget editors
17,889
edits
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
Gianfranco (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Method:''' 25 healthy people (15 males, 10 females; mean age 29 years ± 5), with normal occlusion and no history of temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain, underwent a transcranical electrical stimulation; this allowed a direct bilateral stimulation of the motor roots of the trigeminal motor system, called bilateral Root Motor Evoked Potentials (bR- MEPs). The maximal Absolute Neural Evoked Energy, symmetry and synchrony properties of the resulting bR-MEPs were studied using measures like latency, amplitude and integrated area of the collected signal. An Artificial Neural Network computational model was used to estimate the correlation coefficient with the EMG values of each of both sides to predict the values from the right side by inputting values from the left side. | | '''Method:'''<br />25 healthy people (15 males, 10 females; mean age 29 years ± 5), with normal occlusion and no history of temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain, underwent a transcranical electrical stimulation; this allowed a direct bilateral stimulation of the motor roots of the trigeminal motor system, called bilateral Root Motor Evoked Potentials (bR- MEPs). The maximal Absolute Neural Evoked Energy, symmetry and synchrony properties of the resulting bR-MEPs were studied using measures like latency, amplitude and integrated area of the collected signal. An Artificial Neural Network computational model was used to estimate the correlation coefficient with the EMG values of each of both sides to predict the values from the right side by inputting values from the left side. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Results:''' With regard to the descriptive statistical aspect the mean and SD values were for onset latency (1.96 msec ± 0.18 msec vs''.'' 2.01 msec ± 0.21 msec), amplitude (5.76 mV ± 2.01 mV vs''.'' 5.89 mV ± 2.51 mV) and integral area (11.09 mV/msec ± 4.45 mV/msec vs''.'' 11.27 mV/msec ± 4.34 mV/msec) for right and left masseter muscle, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test shows not statistically significant difference between the medians (confidence level 95%) in fact the ''P''–value was 0.33, 0.96 and 0.86 between sides for latency, amplitude and the EMG integral area, respectively for the bR-MEPs. The similarity between sides of the data sampled, studied in terms of mean squared error and correlation coefficients for latency (R2=0.955, SME=0,032) amplitude (R2=0.948, SME=0.162) and integrated area (R2=0.947, SME=0.212), indicates an organic symmetry of the trigeminal motor nervous system. | | '''Results:'''<br />With regard to the descriptive statistical aspect the mean and SD values were for onset latency (1.96 msec ± 0.18 msec vs''.'' 2.01 msec ± 0.21 msec), amplitude (5.76 mV ± 2.01 mV vs''.'' 5.89 mV ± 2.51 mV) and integral area (11.09 mV/msec ± 4.45 mV/msec vs''.'' 11.27 mV/msec ± 4.34 mV/msec) for right and left masseter muscle, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test shows not statistically significant difference between the medians (confidence level 95%) in fact the ''P''–value was 0.33, 0.96 and 0.86 between sides for latency, amplitude and the EMG integral area, respectively for the bR-MEPs. The similarity between sides of the data sampled, studied in terms of mean squared error and correlation coefficients for latency (R2=0.955, SME=0,032) amplitude (R2=0.948, SME=0.162) and integrated area (R2=0.947, SME=0.212), indicates an organic symmetry of the trigeminal motor nervous system. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Conclusion:''' These results show the high efficiency in terms of symmetry and stability of the bR-MEPs as a normalization factor. | | '''Conclusion:'''<br />These results show the high efficiency in terms of symmetry and stability of the bR-MEPs as a normalization factor. | ||
|} | |} | ||
edits