Difference between revisions of "Store:QLMen09"

Line 36: Line 36:
|}
|}


where <math>Tr_\mathcal{H}</math> is the partial trace over <math>\mathcal{H}</math> . Then, the map  <math>x\rightarrow\Im_A(x)</math>turn out to be a quantum instrument. Thus, the statistical properties of the measurement realized by any indirect measurement model <math>(H,\sigma,U,M_A)</math> is described by a quantum measurement. We remark that conversely any quantum instrument can be represented via the indirect measurement model (Ozawa, 1984).<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":0" /> Thus, quantum instruments mathematically characterize the statistical properties of all the physically realizable quantum measurements.
where <math>Tr_\mathcal{H}</math> is the partial trace over <math>\mathcal{H}</math> . Then, the map  <math>x\rightarrow\Im_A(x)</math>turn out to be a quantum instrument. Thus, the statistical properties of the measurement realized by any indirect measurement model <math>(H,\sigma,U,M_A)</math> is described by a quantum measurement. We remark that conversely any quantum instrument can be represented via the indirect measurement model (Ozawa, 1984).<ref name=":0" />Thus, quantum instruments mathematically characterize the statistical properties of all the physically realizable quantum measurements.

Revision as of 12:57, 11 November 2022

4. Quantum instruments from the scheme of indirect measurements

The basic model for construction of quantum instruments is based on the scheme of indirect measurements. This scheme formalizes the following situation: measurement’s outputs are generated via interaction of a system with a measurement apparatus . This apparatus consists of a complex physical device interacting with  and a pointer that shows the result of measurement, say spin up or spin down. An observer can see only outputs of the pointer and he associates these outputs with the values of the observable  for the system . Thus, the indirect measurement scheme involves:

  1. the states of the systems and the apparatus
  2. the operator   representing the interaction-dynamics for the system
  3. the meter observable  giving outputs of the pointer of the apparatus .

An indirect measurement model, introduced in Ozawa (1984)[1] as a “(general) measuring process”, is a quadruple

consisting of a Hilbert space , a density operator , a unitary operator   on the tensor product of the state spaces of   and and a Hermitian operator  on . By this measurement model, the Hilbert space  describes the states of the apparatus , the unitary operator  describes the time-evolution of the composite system , the density operator  describes the initial state of the apparatus , and the Hermitian operator  describes the meter observable of the apparatus . Then, the output probability distribution in the system state  is given by

 

where  is the spectral projection of  for the eigenvalue .

The change of the state  of the system  caused by the measurement for the outcome   is represented with the aid of the map  in the space of density operators defined as

 

where  is the partial trace over . Then, the map  turn out to be a quantum instrument. Thus, the statistical properties of the measurement realized by any indirect measurement model  is described by a quantum measurement. We remark that conversely any quantum instrument can be represented via the indirect measurement model (Ozawa, 1984).[1]Thus, quantum instruments mathematically characterize the statistical properties of all the physically realizable quantum measurements.

  1. 1.0 1.1 Ozawa M. Quantum measuring processes for continuous observables J. Math. Phys., 25 (1984), pp. 79-87 Google Scholar