(48 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="homepage-container">
'''Abstract''': The article discusses the development and purpose of the Research Diagnostic Criteria ({{Tooltip|RDC|'''Abstract:''' The article discusses the development and purpose of the {{Tooltip|Research|Temporomandibolar Disorder|2}} Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for temporomandibular disorders (<math>a \times b</math>{{Tooltip||leggi: "A per B"|2}}), which was established to create standardized clinical case definitions with reproducibility across clinicians and researchers. The RDC project was based on empirical data from longitudinal epidemiological research and aimed to improve diagnosis, prognostic studies, and treatment effectiveness. The criteria <math>a \times b</math> were derived from a literature review of diagnostic methods and validated through reproducibility studies.}}) for temporomandibular disorders (<math>a \times b = c</math>{{Tooltip||Temporomandibolar Disorder}}), which was established to create standardized clinical case definitions with reproducibility across clinicians and researchers. The RDC project was based on empirical data from longitudinal epidemiological research and aimed to improve diagnosis, prognostic studies, and treatment effectiveness. The criteria were derived from a literature review of diagnostic methods and validated through reproducibility studies.
{{main menu}}
  <div class="homepage-logo-container">
[[File:MP-logo-br.png|300px|class=homepage-logo|link=Main Page]]
  </div>
  <div class="nav-bar"></div>
  <div class="homepage-slider">
    <div class="homepage-slide-1">The Past</div>
    <div class="homepage-slide-2">The Present</div>
    <div class="homepage-slide-3">The Future</div>
  </div>
  <div class="homepage-side-by-side">
    <div class="homepage-video">
<youtube width="420">V-77DQkjz0Y</youtube>
    </div>
    <div class="homepage-what-is-it">
<span class="colour-button">[[Special:RequestAccount|Change the 'Paradigm' by joining us]]</span>


The RDC adopts a two-axis diagnostic model: Axis I covers clinical diagnoses, classifying TMD into three groups: muscle conditions, meniscal dislocation, and joint disorders such as arthralgia and arthritis. Axis II addresses the psychosocial and pain-related disability of patients. The RDC emphasizes precise measurements and structured questionnaires to avoid ambiguous clinical descriptions.


<p class="homepage-title">'''What is it'''</p>
A significant limitation of the RDC is its exclusion of certain instrumental diagnostic methodologies, which may restrict early differential diagnosis, especially when distinguishing between TMD and organic neurological or systemic diseases that present with similar symptoms. Despite its structured approach, the RDC is criticized for focusing too heavily on dental aspects and not considering broader medical diagnostics. The article concludes by stressing the need to integrate the RDC with a more comprehensive medical approach and presents clinical case studies to illustrate diagnostic challenges.
 
Masticationpedia is a not-for-profit Anglo-Saxon organization, it is a Charity that operates in dental medical research, in particular in the field of the neurophysiology of masticatory rehabilitation.
 
A place for scientific and professional sharing where anyone can acquire essential information on innovative clinical procedures, from the humble scientist to the inexperienced citizen.
 
A place where Colleagues can grow freely and democratically and where citizens can obtain documented information about their health.
 
[[Mission|Read more]]
    </div>
  </div>
 
<div class="homepage-separator"></div>
 
  <div class="homepage-side-by-side">
    <div class="homepage-how-to-follow-it">
<p class="homepage-title">'''How to follow it'''</p>
 
We know well that in the myriad of scientific journals, training courses and anything else the profession is becoming inflated with repetitive and sometimes incomplete news. It is therefore legitimate to ask ourselves: 'What is the cultural and professional contribution coming from Masticationpedia'
 
For this reason, we present a preview of one of the concluding chapters in which the scientific and editorial philosophy that Masticationpedia aims to transmit is evident.
 
 
If you want to understand the clinical scientific process and the scientific philosophy of Masticationpedia, you can follow the [[Book index|index of the book]], but you have to be registered.
 
 
<span class="colour-button">[[Special:RequestAccount|Subscribe]]</span>
    </div>
    <div>Iframe here</div>
  </div>
 
<div class="homepage-separator"></div>
 
  <div class="homepage-side-by-side">
    <div class="homepage-why-to-enroll">
      <p class="homepage-title">'''Why to enroll'''</p>
Einstein's metaphor is emblematic: the theory is when we know everything but nothing works. Practice is when everything works but we don't know why. In any case, we always combine theory and practice: nothing works and we don't know why. Basically, this also happens in dentistry where everything doesn't work and we don't know why.
 
Well, Masticationpedia aims to probe the functional properties of the masticatory functions, ranging in various fields of science without prejudices or corporate ideologies to grasp the access key to the system.
 
<div class="informative-video">
Informative video →
</div>
 
If shared, this scientific-clinical know-how will be converted into specific 'Centers' that will employ neurophysiological technologies for masticatory rehabilitation called Masticationpedia Network and will be the exclusive brand of each affiliated dentist.
 
[[See our Networks]]
    </div>
    <div>
<youtube width="420">V-77DQkjz0Y</youtube>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="einstein-quote">
<p style="font-size: 200%;">The theory is when we know everything but nothing works. Practice is when everything works but we don't know why. In any case, we always end up with combining theory with practice: nothing works and we don't know why.</p>
 
<p style="font-size: 150%">Albert Einstein</p>
  </div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 13:21, 25 October 2024

Abstract: The article discusses the development and purpose of the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDCAbstract: The article discusses the development and purpose of the ResearchTemporomandibolar Disorder Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for temporomandibular disorders ( Info.pngleggi: "A per B"), which was established to create standardized clinical case definitions with reproducibility across clinicians and researchers. The RDC project was based on empirical data from longitudinal epidemiological research and aimed to improve diagnosis, prognostic studies, and treatment effectiveness. The criteria were derived from a literature review of diagnostic methods and validated through reproducibility studies.) for temporomandibular disorders ( Info.pngTemporomandibolar Disorder), which was established to create standardized clinical case definitions with reproducibility across clinicians and researchers. The RDC project was based on empirical data from longitudinal epidemiological research and aimed to improve diagnosis, prognostic studies, and treatment effectiveness. The criteria were derived from a literature review of diagnostic methods and validated through reproducibility studies.

The RDC adopts a two-axis diagnostic model: Axis I covers clinical diagnoses, classifying TMD into three groups: muscle conditions, meniscal dislocation, and joint disorders such as arthralgia and arthritis. Axis II addresses the psychosocial and pain-related disability of patients. The RDC emphasizes precise measurements and structured questionnaires to avoid ambiguous clinical descriptions.

A significant limitation of the RDC is its exclusion of certain instrumental diagnostic methodologies, which may restrict early differential diagnosis, especially when distinguishing between TMD and organic neurological or systemic diseases that present with similar symptoms. Despite its structured approach, the RDC is criticized for focusing too heavily on dental aspects and not considering broader medical diagnostics. The article concludes by stressing the need to integrate the RDC with a more comprehensive medical approach and presents clinical case studies to illustrate diagnostic challenges.